Skip to content

Ottawa, ON · Private foundation

Green Municipal Fund

To assist municipal governments in canada to lever investments in municipal environmental projects and to provide grants for feasibility studies assessments sustainable community plans and field tests and grants loans and/or loan guarantees to eligible receipients for project implementation.

C$42M
Granted FY2024still arriving
238
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
Regions reached
C$2.4M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 238 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$41k
  • C$10k–50k77 grants · C$2.1M
  • C$50k–250k118 grants · C$14M
  • C$250k+38 grants · C$26M
C$84,070
Median grant
8
Regions reached
C$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in CanadaC$2,381,390
Sundance Housing CooperativeC$2,314,080
Kenora District Services BoardC$1,547,765
Kenora District Services BoardC$1,494,548
City of GuelphC$1,475,000
Brightside Community Homes FoundationC$1,400,000
City of CalgaryC$1,212,500
National Affordable Housing CorporationC$1,129,100
City of OttawaC$1,014,125
City of CharlottetownC$930,300
Lower Columbia Affordable Housing SocietyC$925,990
Enwave Energy CorporationC$894,500
City of SaskatoonC$754,150
Indwell Community HomesC$684,480
Municipality of the County of ColchesterC$658,175
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Which regions your grants reach

Alberta
C$58M
Ontario
C$54M
British Columbia
C$16M
Quebec
C$8.2M
Nova Scotia
C$4.5M
Saskatchewan
C$4.2M
Prince Edward Island
C$2.8M
Manitoba
C$2.5M
New Brunswick
C$2.4M
Nunavut
C$1.0M
Newfoundland and Labrador
C$816k
Northwest Territories
C$203k
Yukon
C$25k

Grants placed by each grantee’s location, read from the T3010 filings.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$103M · 143 repeat orgsC$73M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

143 repeat relationships — 75 still active in FY2024, 68 since wound down; 138 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

143
262

Total granted

C$103M
C$50M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+24%

Still filing today

14%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$23M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AE
    ALBERTA ECO TRUST FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · C$43M · revenue +80%
  • CO
    City of Saskatoon
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$2.4M · revenue +23%
  • BC
    Brightside Community Homes Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$2.3M · revenue +201%

Funded once

  • OC
    OTTAWA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$22M · revenue +32% · 42% of their budget
  • CR
    Capital Regional District
    one grant, 2022 · C$3.0M · revenue -6%
  • CN
    Clean Nova Scotia Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$1.4M · revenue +59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunset Housing Society

To provide low income housing to senior citizens of british columbia

—
2
Greater Victoria Housing Society

Provide and operate subsidized rental housing for low to moderate income seniors families and disabled adults. provide and operate below market rental housing for low to moderate income adults and families

—
3
Westwinds Communities

Westwinds communities provides and maintains diversified and affordable housing options for low to moderate income seniors low income families and those with special needs. tenant support coordination with social servicing agencies.

—
4
Habitat Housing Society

Habitat housing society (hhs) develops builds and operates affordable housing in the south fraser region. the society currently owns a townhome complex to provide affordable housing to families on low to moderate incomes. hhs also owns an…

—
5
Innovative Community Support Services

The organization operates residences for physically and developmentally delayed adults. the organization offers employment programs social enterprise community programming and semi-independent living for individuals.

—
6
Affordable Housing: Vancouver Island Society
—
7
Tikva Housing Society

Provided affordable rental housing to low-income individuals and families Delivered subsidy program to assist low-income individuals and families facing temporary financial or health crisis to remain in their market rental homes and avoid…

—
8
Neighbourhood Housing Society

Management and administration of low cost rental housing for low income urban singles under an operating agreement with bc housing including a program to assist its tenants in connecting with health and employmnt resources

—
9
Heart River Housing

Heart river housing provides and promotes healthy safe independent living and strives to provide affordable housing options in our communities. heart river housing manages 172 lodge suites in three northern alberta communities. these…

—
10
Kaslo Housing Society

Manage and operate the penny lane apartments as a landlord under an operating agreement with BC housing Exploring the possibility of new local housing projects

—
11
Autumn House Inc.

Autumn house inc. operates an indepdendent living seniors housing complex.

—
12
Independent Living Housing Society of Greater Victoria

Housing and care for seniors low-income and those with disabilities

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ellwood House (Ottawa) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Raising the Roof Chez Toit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 543 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/74
Grantees still filing
41/74
Grew since you first funded

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALBERTA ECO TRUST FOUNDATION — C$43,246,366 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetOTTAWA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — C$21,583,358 over 1y, 42% of budgetCity of Saskatoon — C$2,409,789 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetBrightside Community Homes Foundation — C$2,323,172 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetClean Nova Scotia Foundation — C$1,445,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetHeartland Housing Foundation — C$1,349,500 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetIndwell Community Homes — C$684,480 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYWCA of Banff — C$500,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetOntario Water Centre — C$465,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetCommunity Seniors Co-Operative Limited — C$425,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetWINDSOR ELMS VILLAGE FOR CONTINUING CARE SOCIETY — C$425,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCity of Vaughan — C$387,746 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetClean Air Partnership — C$350,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCity of Richmond — C$293,969 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetAntigonish Affordable Housing Society — C$265,200 over 3y, 32% of budgetKitikmeot Heritage Society — C$250,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetToronto and Region Conservation Authority — C$175,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetValemount Senior Citizens Housing Society — C$175,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetCity of Airdrie — C$175,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCity of Peterborough — C$173,978 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetREEP Green Solutions — C$168,700 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetUniversity of Winnipeg Community Renewal Corporation Inc. — C$165,243 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetGEF Seniors Housing — C$155,870 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJohn Howard Society of Victoria — C$148,950 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMaRS Discovery District — C$137,479 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDenman Housing Association — C$134,433 over 3y, 19% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALBERTA ECO TRUST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OTTAWA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Capital Regional District ↗
  • Who funds City of Saskatoon ↗
  • Who funds The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada ↗
  • Who funds Brightside Community Homes Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Clean Nova Scotia Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Heartland Housing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Indwell Community Homes ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ivey FoundationON6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ivey Foundation · Petsmart Charities of Canada - Charités Petsmart du Canada · The Trottier Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Trottier · Brampton and Caledon Community Foundation · The George Cedric Metcalf Charitable Foundation · The Peter Gilgan Foundation · The Catherine Donnelly Foundation · World Wildlife Fund Canada Fonds Mondial Pour la Nature Can Ada · United Way Southern Vancouver Island · Suncor Energy Foundation/Fondation Suncor Energie · Community Foundation Grey Bruce · Royal Lepage Shelter Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 543 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 734668890:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Green Municipal’s filings →