Truro, NS · Charitable organization
Grace Independent Baptist Church
Church services children's ministries youth actives home visitation and bible studies
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAPTIST INTERNATIONS MISSIONS INC | C$3,900 |
| VISTA BAPTIST CHURCH | C$2,710 |
| VISTA BAPTIST CHURCH | C$2,710 |
| BAPTIST MID-MISSIONS | C$2,550 |
| HARVESTER BAPTIST CHURCH | C$1,950 |
| FOREST BLEN BIBLE CAMP | C$675 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BIBaptist International Missions Inc8× · 2017–2024 · C$32k · revenue +85%
- BMBAPTIST MID-MISSIONS6× · 2019–2024 · C$15k · revenue +37%
- HBHARVESTER BAPTIST CHURCH8× · 2017–2024 · C$15k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- BMBaptist MI Missionone grant, 2017 · C$4k
- LILockeport Ind Baptist Churchone grant, 2017 · C$3k
- LILOCKEPORT IND. BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2018 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.