Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Portage La Prairie, MB · Charitable organization

Good Shepherd Parish

Organize and provide religious worship and instruction provide ministries for men women youth and children for the purpose of advancing roman catholic religious worship instruction and ministry.

C$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$47k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$4k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$47k
C$47,360
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC ARCHIEPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF WINNIPEGC$47,360
CHALICEC$3,541
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$324k · 3 repeat orgsC$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -54% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$324k
C$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-54%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CATHOLIC ARCHIEPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF WINNIPEG
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$312k · revenue +87%
  • C
    CHALICE
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$7k · revenue +8%
  • CO
    Commissariate of the Holy Land
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$6k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • DA
    Development an Peace
    one grant, 2017 · C$26k · revenue -54%
  • TS
    The Society for the Propagation of the Faith / World Mission
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -54%
  • LV
    Life Vision ( League for Life )graduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$395 · revenue +321%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC ARCHIEPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF WINNIPEG — C$311,594 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetDevelopment an Peace — C$26,371 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHALICE — C$6,642 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCommissariate of the Holy Land — C$5,872 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Society for the Propagation of the Faith / World Mission — C$1,180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLife Vision ( League for Life ) — C$395 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 140850371:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Good Shepherd Parish’s filings →