Skip to content

Vancouver, BC · Public foundation

Global Change for Children Society

GC4C continued to support ongoing charities and new ones as described in Note 3 to its financial statements.

C$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$28k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$21k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$74k
C$10,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Coquitlam Rotary clubC$28,000
adopt a Village in LaosC$25,000
Options Community Services SocietyC$11,482
OneProsper International Inc.C$10,000
the Kenya Education Endowment FundC$9,679
Canadian Friends of Aniquem Health DevelopmentC$5,000
Yukon Food for LearningC$5,000
Cameray Community FundC$985
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$306k · 12 repeat orgsC$42k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

C$306k
C$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    adopt a Village in Laos
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$57k · revenue +30%
  • TK
    the Kenya Education Endowment Fund
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$54k · revenue +3%
  • CF
    Canadian Friends of Aniquem Health Development
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$27k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • ET
    Empower Through Music Society
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +7% · 46% of their budget
  • I
    Imagine1Day
    one grant, 2017 · C$9k · revenue -25%
  • OG
    One Girl Can Society
    one grant, 2018 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vietnam Education Society

Infastructure projects for school pre-schools and lunch programs and summer camps for girls at risk.

—
2
Nepali Children's Education Project

Advancing educational opportunities for children attending lower secondary higher secondary and post-secondary school in Kathmandu Nepal by providing financial and social support through comprehensive scholarship and mentorship programs…

—
3
Pendo International Projects

Quality education program zero hunger program clean water and sanitation program. school transportation services program

—
4
Help 2 Overcome Society

H2O works together with schools in the developing world helping them to set up and manage practical and sustainable sanitation and hygiene facilities. We work with individual schools together with teachers community leaders and government…

—
5
IPartner India Canada

Educate Her Empower Her: We give scholarships to girls who are from poor families and who are vulnerable to exploitation and trafficking. We work in a certain community where it is a custom to send adolescent girls for sex work to provide…

—
6
Cameras for Girls

Cameras For Girls pursues Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality in Africa using photography as our catalyst. We provide women who face gender-based barriers to employment with a camera to keep and a 4-phase photography storytelling and…

—
7
Nepal School Projects

Support Of Basic Human Needs Projects Such As School And Health Post Construction; Construction Of Safe Drinking Water Projects And Environmental Sanitation.

—
8
Women's Education and Literacy in Nepal

Education and literacy proprograms for women in nepal income generation projects for women in nepal scholarship

—
9
Kina Social Ventures Society

Educating future leaders - scholarships for girls at risk girls college program - girls scholarships girls in technology - computer programming for young women in nepal

—
10
The Water School

Through implementing partners the water school runs programs focusing on health sanitation and clean water in various districts throughout uganda. also the water school provide programs in uganda to reduce teenage pregnancy including…

—
11
Refugee Girls Worldwide

Maternal Health Program This program supports women and girls in accessing essential maternal sexual and reproductive health services. Food Protection Program This program provides refugee families with monthly food supplies to ensure…

—
12
Partners for International Development (PfID)

PFID operates poverty alleviation projects in Kenya with a focus on the provision of basic education at the upper primary and secondary school level. The education projects serve economically disadvantaged children and youth. These…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is We Charity and the most unlike its peers is Yukon Food for Learning Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetadopt a Village in Laos — C$57,011 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetthe Kenya Education Endowment Fund — C$54,390 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetCoquitlam Rotary club — C$50,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetCanadian Friends of Aniquem Health Development — C$27,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetONE GIRL CAN SOCIETY — C$24,450 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCLASSROOMS FOR AFRICA (ABETAVU) — C$22,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetOptions Community Services Society — C$19,482 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYukon Food For Learning — C$16,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetNorthern Society For Domestic Peace — C$11,648 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCameray Community Fund — C$11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEmpower Through Music Society — C$10,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetOneProsper International Inc. — C$10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetImagine1Day — C$8,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPlea Community Services — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWE Charity — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAct 2 Child & Family Services — C$3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vancity Community FoundationBC8.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vancity Community Foundation · The Federation of Community Social Services Society of British Columbia · United Way British Columbia · Canadian Women's Foundation / Fondation Canadienne Des Femmes · Vancouver Foundation · Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund Trust · Aqueduct Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 832957898:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Global Change for Children Society’s filings →