St. Catharines, ON · Charitable organization
Glenridge Bible Church
Worship services
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NIAGARA LIFE CENTRE | C$2,650 |
| YOUTH UNLIMITED | C$2,650 |
| TRUTH FOR TEENS | C$2,650 |
| INTERVARSITY | C$2,650 |
| GALCOM INTERNATIONAL | C$2,650 |
| JEWS FOR JESUS | C$2,650 |
| AWANA | C$2,650 |
| NORTHWIND FAMILY MINISTRIES | C$2,650 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,150 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NFNORTHWINDS FAMILY MINISTRIES7× · 2017–2023 · C$35k · revenue +307%
- NLNIAGARA LIFE CENTRE8× · 2017–2024 · C$27k · revenue +2%
- IINTERVARSITY8× · 2017–2024 · C$24k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- CGCAMINO GLOBALone grant, 2019 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
The Culture Changers deliver seminars on Biblical teaching and how it applies to cultural issues.
Speaking engagements
Counselling with a biblical perspective- pastoral counselling - youth work businesses marriage individuals
Teaching in churches prisons and camps. Assisting in the development of local churches. Working with church leaders in their personal or corporate need.
To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Missionsm counseling for individuals family seminars camping and field trips extending help to caregivers and immigrants children and youth programs. christian fellowship and evangelism opportunities.
Youth conferences Worship services Leadership and Evangelism.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Missions in Ontario Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Niagara Life Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUTH FOR TEENS ↗
- Who funds NORTHWINDS FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds NIAGARA LIFE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds INTERVARSITY ↗
- Who funds GALCOM INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds JEWS FOR JESUS ↗
- Who funds CHRISTSTAR ↗
- Who funds WELLAND CANAL MISSION ↗
- Who funds Crosstrainers ↗
- Who funds AVANT MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds YOUTH UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds CAMINO GLOBAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.