Murray River, PE · Charitable organization
Glad Tidings Tabernacle
Church services sunday a.m & p.m.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$4k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA | C$10,232 |
| HARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH PEI | C$1,887 |
| THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA | C$1,887 |
| ERDO | C$542 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA6× · 2019–2024 · C$55k · revenue +18%
- TPThe Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada8× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +22%
- HHHARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH PEI2× · 2023–2024 · C$3k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- MCMasters College & Seminaryone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -14%
- CPCAMP PENIEL SOCIETYone grant, 2019 · C$350 · revenue -6%
- BGBilly Graham Evangelistic Association of Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$140
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lakeshore pentecostal camp conducts spiritual and physical retreats for boys & girls junior highs youth young adults seniors and families.
Missionary organizations evangelism place of worship congregations social outreach religious fellowships & auxiliary organizations.
Preaching Teaching
We operate kids youth family and seniors summer camps for relgious and recreation programs. we hold pastor's meetings women's conference and lead seminaors for religious education prayer and ministering to the public
We operate a year-round camp for religious and educational programs.
Visitation
Missions and to communicate prophetic vision to the pentecostal holiness church of canada; to empower and assist local church leadership;
Children's camping program-provide an opportunity for campers at an understanding age to learn about jesus christ the bible leadership and social/physical activities
1) our organization supports missions that include: children's summer camps youth activities counselling disaster relief medical help. 2) our education programs include: sunday school vacation bible school bible study groups. 3) we hold…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maritime District Conference District Office and the most unlike its peers is Erdo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH PEI ↗
- Who funds ERDO ↗
- Who funds Masters College & Seminary ↗
- Who funds EVANGELINE PENTECOSTAL CAMP ↗
- Who funds CAMP PENIEL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Open Door Outreach ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE MISSION INC. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.