Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Gemilas Chesed of Clanton Park

To supply and render services of a charitable nature; to give non-interest loans to qualified people; to give charitable gifts to qualified people; to give donations for charitable purposes; to accept donations gifts legacies & bequests; granting non-interest loans to needy people with specific repayment schedule; the fund also…

C$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$14k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$32k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$37k
C$3,600
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$203k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIAL SERVICES & COMMUNAL MATTERS FUNDC$13,800
CHEVRAH OSEH CHESEDC$12,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$11,600
CONGREGATION CHASDEI BOBOVC$9,200
YESHIVA LUBAVITCHC$4,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHERN ONTARIOC$3,600
KOLLEL AVREICHEMC$3,600
KAV SHALOMC$2,800
BNAI ZIONC$2,700
BAIS MEIRC$2,400
BROTHERS OF MERCY FOUNDATIONC$2,100
KDY INSTITUTEC$1,000
AGUDATH ISRAEL CONGREGATIONC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$516k · 24 repeat orgsC$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
12

Total granted

C$516k
C$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+6%

Still filing today

88%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHEVRAH OSEH CHESED
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$68k · revenue +10%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$65k · revenue +423%
  • CC
    CONGREGATION CHASDEI BOBOV
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$56k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • SS
    Shomrei Shabbos Chevra Mishnayos
    one grant, 2017 · C$17k · revenue +4%
  • KY
    KOLLEL YISMACH
    one grant, 2023 · C$4k · revenue +6%
  • MC
    MAZEL CHARITY FUND
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
2
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
3
Zolty Charitable Foundation

Administered the charitable activities of the zolty family and others for the advancement of education and jewish religion and loans to the needy.

—
4
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
5
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
6
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
7
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
8
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
9
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
10
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
11
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
12
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Kdy Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHEVRAH OSEH CHESED — C$67,820 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$64,530 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION CHASDEI BOBOV — C$55,656 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIAL SERVICES & COMMUNAL MATTERS FUND — C$49,560 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetRuchama Fraidel Relief Organization — C$40,660 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetKH MEOROTH — C$26,590 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL AVEICHIM — C$25,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$23,440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Funds for Families and Children — C$19,174 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetCLANTON PARK — C$18,822 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetShomrei Shabbos Chevra Mishnayos — C$16,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION — C$12,620 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBrothers of Mercy — C$10,410 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJACS — C$8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF TORONTO (CAMP & AGUDATH) — C$8,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDIENA CHARITALBE TRUST — C$8,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetSINAI CHILD SERVICES — C$6,400 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$6,040 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKAV SHALOM — C$5,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL YISMACH — C$4,160 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHERN ONTARIO — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNAI ZION — C$2,930 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBAIS MEIR — C$2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshivat Eitz Chaim — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS ZIBOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEEMAN — C$585 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI CENTRE — C$500 over 1y, 13% of budgetJERUSALEM OUTREACH CENTRE — C$500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetZICHMAN BINYOMIN — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA NACHLAS ZVI — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH — C$350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNextjen Judaism — C$144 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAISHEL - PRIORITY - 1 OUTREACH PROGRAM — C$125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNER ISRAEL — C$86 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Friends of Yad L'Achim — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The George Hofstedter…The F&R Hauer Charita…The S. Sigler Family …The Chaim Moshe Fried…Rayjo Charitable TrustAri and Naomi Klein C…Zolty Charitable Foun…Fieldgate Cares Found…Heitner Charitable Fo…The Koenig Family Fou…The Gross Family Foun…The B&C Zy Gezunt Cha…
The George Hofstedter Family FoundationON20.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Ari and Naomi Klein Charitable Trust · Zolty Charitable Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · The Koenig Family Foundation · The Gross Family Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-05-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 118936673:2024-05-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Gemilas Chesed of Clanton Park’s filings →