Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Gates of Mercy

The charitey distributes funds to provide relief of poverty, educational subsidies and bursaries as well as donations to other registered charities.

C$1.6M
Granted FY2018
48
Grants FY2018
—
Regions reached
C$340k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under C$10k26 grants · C$69k
  • C$10k–50k17 grants · C$457k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$479k
  • C$250k+2 grants · C$624k
C$7,700
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$197k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Beth OlothC$340,000
Bikur CholimC$283,600
Kollel Daf Yomi InstituteC$232,000
KH MeorothC$146,855
Dana Charitable OrganizationC$100,000
Bais Yaakov ElementaryC$44,150
Project Inspire CanadaC$40,800
Canadian Association of Slobodker YeshivaC$39,425
Institute for Advance Judaic StudiesC$37,700
N'Siv HachesedC$35,000
Institute for Advanced Talmudic StudiesC$34,730
Yeshiva GedolahC$33,550
Toronto ChederC$31,150
Forest Hill Jewish CentreC$30,000
Foundation for Angelman SyndromeC$26,750
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.1M · 23 repeat orgsC$705k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

C$2.1M
C$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+3%

Still filing today

78%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$486k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Bikur Cholim
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$453k · revenue +0%
  • IF
    Institute for Advanced Talmudic Studeis
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$111k · revenue +33%
  • AI
    Advance Institute for Judaic Studies
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$82k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IS
    Integrated Service for Autism
    one grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue -99%
  • BT
    Bnei Tzion
    one grant, 2017 · C$32k · revenue +12%
  • J
    Jacsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$27k · revenue +74%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
3
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
4
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
5
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
6
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
7
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
8
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
9
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
10
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
11
Torah Schools for Israel

To provide scholarships to deserving students to enable them to study the bible and other jewish courses to subsidize bus transportation for needy students to pay for tutors to provide supplemental hours of education and ensure the…

—
12
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Seeds of Hope 4 Autism. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/61
Grantees still filing
40/61
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBeth Oloth — C$585,883 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBikur Cholim — C$452,915 over 2y, 15% of budgetDana Charitable Organization — C$213,928 over 2y, 15% of budgetInstitute for Advanced Talmudic Studeis — C$111,280 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetAdvance Institute for Judaic Studies — C$82,300 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBais Yaakov Elementary — C$70,950 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYeshiva Gedolah — C$50,550 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetIntegrated Service for Autism — C$50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetYeshiva Yesodel Hatorah — C$47,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetToronto Cheder — C$42,150 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetProject Inspire Canada — C$40,800 over 1y, 10% of budgetCanadian Association of Slobodker Yeshiva — C$39,425 over 1y, 22% of budgetYeshiva Nachlas Tzvl — C$37,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBnei Tzion — C$31,550 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJacs — C$27,130 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFoundation for Angelman Syndrome — C$26,750 over 1y, 37% of budgetBeis Hatavshil & Hachnosas Orchim — C$25,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetR.F.R.O. — C$23,100 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJF Canada — C$22,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBeis Meir — C$20,700 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetNer Israel — C$19,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSocial Servives & Communal Matters Fund — C$16,450 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetChat — C$15,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCFFC — C$15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBeth Jacob High School — C$14,325 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBrothers of Mercy — C$13,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBnos Bais Yaakov — C$12,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMesivta Birchas Shmuel — C$11,185 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAteres Yisroel — C$9,300 over 2y, 15% of budgetSinai Child Care Services — C$9,150 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetBuilding a Jewish Tomorrow — C$8,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMishkan Hatorah — C$8,575 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetC.O.C. — C$8,250 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetEzer Mizion — C$7,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetToronto Care Fund — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBnos Chaya — C$7,080 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetShomer Shabbos — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInstitute Torah Education — C$4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYad L'achim — C$3,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCF Education and Welfare CIS — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshiva Nefesh Dovid — C$2,010 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCF Rabbi Meir Baal Haness — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCasdel Ger — C$2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCF of Sahalva — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCF Yeshiva Lomza — C$1,800 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetKayla's Children Centre — C$1,020 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCF Be'er Avrohom — C$1,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetMachzikei Torah — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moral Arc FoundationON38× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moral Arc Foundation · Beth Oloth Charitable Organization · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Abarbanel Eiger Charitable Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization.

Source object 891283145:2018-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Gates of Mercy’s filings →