Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
Gates of Mercy
The charitey distributes funds to provide relief of poverty, educational subsidies and bursaries as well as donations to other registered charities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under C$10k26 grants · C$69k
- C$10k–50k17 grants · C$457k
- C$50k–250k3 grants · C$479k
- C$250k+2 grants · C$624k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Beth Oloth | C$340,000 |
| Bikur Cholim | C$283,600 |
| Kollel Daf Yomi Institute | C$232,000 |
| KH Meoroth | C$146,855 |
| Dana Charitable Organization | C$100,000 |
| Bais Yaakov Elementary | C$44,150 |
| Project Inspire Canada | C$40,800 |
| Canadian Association of Slobodker Yeshiva | C$39,425 |
| Institute for Advance Judaic Studies | C$37,700 |
| N'Siv Hachesed | C$35,000 |
| Institute for Advanced Talmudic Studies | C$34,730 |
| Yeshiva Gedolah | C$33,550 |
| Toronto Cheder | C$31,150 |
| Forest Hill Jewish Centre | C$30,000 |
| Foundation for Angelman Syndrome | C$26,750 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$486k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BCBikur Cholim2× · 2017–2018 · C$453k · revenue +0%
- IFInstitute for Advanced Talmudic Studeis2× · 2017–2018 · C$111k · revenue +33%
- AIAdvance Institute for Judaic Studies2× · 2017–2018 · C$82k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- ISIntegrated Service for Autismone grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue -99%
- BTBnei Tzionone grant, 2017 · C$32k · revenue +12%
- JJacsgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$27k · revenue +74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
Support of jewish education and institutions
To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.
The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.
To provide scholarships to deserving students to enable them to study the bible and other jewish courses to subsidize bus transportation for needy students to pay for tutors to provide supplemental hours of education and ensure the…
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Seeds of Hope 4 Autism. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Beth Oloth ↗
- Who funds Bikur Cholim ↗
- Who funds KH Meoroth ↗
- Who funds Kollel Daf Yomi Institute ↗
- Who funds Dana Charitable Organization ↗
- Who funds Institute for Advanced Talmudic Studeis ↗
- Who funds Advance Institute for Judaic Studies ↗
- Who funds Bais Yaakov Elementary ↗
- Who funds Yeshiva Gedolah ↗
- Who funds Integrated Service for Autism ↗
- Who funds Yeshiva Yesodel Hatorah ↗
- Who funds Toronto Cheder ↗
- Who funds Project Inspire Canada ↗
- Who funds Canadian Association of Slobodker Yeshiva ↗
- Who funds Yeshiva Nachlas Tzvl ↗
- Who funds N'Siv Hachesed ↗
- Who funds Bnei Tzion ↗
- Who funds Forest Hill Jewish Centre ↗
- Who funds Jacs ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Angelman Syndrome ↗
- Who funds Beis Hatavshil & Hachnosas Orchim ↗
- Who funds R.F.R.O. ↗
- Who funds JF Canada ↗
- Who funds Beis Meir ↗
- Who funds Ner Israel ↗
- Who funds Social Servives & Communal Matters Fund ↗
- Who funds Chat ↗
- Who funds CFFC ↗
- Who funds Beth Jacob High School ↗
- Who funds Brothers of Mercy ↗
- Who funds Bnos Bais Yaakov ↗
- Who funds Mesivta Birchas Shmuel ↗
- Who funds Ateres Yisroel ↗
- Who funds Sinai Child Care Services ↗
- Who funds Building a Jewish Tomorrow ↗
- Who funds Mishkan Hatorah ↗
- Who funds C.O.C. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Moral Arc Foundation · Beth Oloth Charitable Organization · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Abarbanel Eiger Charitable Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.