Lachine, QC · Charitable organization
Full Gospel Assembly Lachine
-to reach souls for christ -spread the gospel -weekly worship services -pastoral care -visitation
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAOC-MISSION LINK | C$4,800 |
| PAOC-QUEBEC DISTRICT | C$2,000 |
| CHRISTIAN DIRECTION | C$1,000 |
| DANS LA RUE | C$1,000 |
| WELCOME HALL MISSION | C$1,000 |
| DUNAMIS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL | C$500 |
| ONTARIO BETHEL PARK CAMP | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PDPAOC-QUEBEC DISTRICT2× · 2017–2018 · C$7k · revenue +32%
- DLDANS LA RUE2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +114%
- WHWELCOME HALL MISSION2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE-CANADAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Theological education & pastoral training in christian & particularly pentecostal beliefs
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Post-secondary Bible Institute with in depth Bible instruction and Christian ministry service training; Language School teaching French as a Second Language primarily to missionaries to French-speaking countries; Summer and Winter Bible…
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Ministère paroissiale aumônerie missions
1. Teaching the Word of God and preaching the Gospel of Jesus 2. Working with Individual missionaries and mission organizations engaged in the propagation of Jesus Christ 3. Direct evangelism and discipleship of national Christians
Precher la parole de dieu
Church ministry 1. worship god 2. evangelism 3. teaching and preaching the holy scripture 4. equip members and other related ministries of the gospel
Programme d'aide alimentaire pour familles démunies Programme d'évangélisation pour enfants et adultes
Our mission is to provide a sanctuary for people to create a new life with the help of jesus christ. we assist new comers to canada to bring a new life.
The purpose of acop is to proclaim the gospel in every area of the world limited only by personnel and resource constraints. acop provides leadership for churches in canada which are affiliated with the parent body. outside of canada acop…
To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is District Du QuÉBec Des AssemblÉEs De La PentecÔTe Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Paoc Mission Link. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.