Oakville, ON · Private foundation
Frank and Janice Lochan Private Foundation
Receiving Donations and Gifts and making Donations to Registered Charitable Organizations
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Huntington Society of Canada | C$31,000 |
| Kerr Street Community Services | C$31,000 |
| Oakville and Milton Humane Society | C$31,000 |
| Fare Share Food Bank Oakville | C$23,000 |
| Oakville Meals on Wheels | C$12,000 |
| Food4Kids Halton | C$11,500 |
| Halton Foof For Thought | C$10,500 |
| The Salvation Army | C$10,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$23k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- OAOakville and Milton Humane Society5× · 2020–2024 · C$121k · revenue +84%
- HSHuntington Society of Canada4× · 2021–2024 · C$111k · revenue +31%
- KSKerr Street Community Services3× · 2020–2024 · C$66k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- FSFare Share Food Bank Oakvilleone grant, 2024 · C$23k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide healthy food for children aged 4-14 years with limited or no food weekends or during the summer months.
Provide meal and food programs
Emergency food procurement. solicitation and distribution of food obtained from the community and from the food industry. food is distributed to local food banks hot meal programs and child nutrition programs.
Meals for seniors
Providing healthy food packages to children aged 4 to 13 in the Toronto region who face food insecurity on weekends and during summer months. The program targets participants with limited or no access to food at home ensuring they receive…
Operates hospitals providing healthcare services to the towns of oakville milton & halton hills and their surrounding communities.
Provide food hampers for individuals & families in the municipalities of riverdale & oakview
To provide emergency food for families and individuals in need of support - food security
The charity is operating a long-term care facility in the city of oakville.
Meals delivered to those 65 years or older who are unable to cook themselves nutritious meals
Run a food bank for a brighton ontario support brighton meals on wheels
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is FOOD4KIDS Halton and the most unlike its peers is The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada/Conseil De Direction De L'armÉE Du Salut Du Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oakville and Milton Humane Society ↗
- Who funds Huntington Society of Canada ↗
- Who funds FareShare Food Bank Oakville ↗
- Who funds Kerr Street Community Services ↗
- Who funds The Salvation Army Community Church ↗
- Who funds Oakville Meals on Wheels ↗
- Who funds Food4Kids Halton ↗
- Who funds Halton Foof For Thought ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oakville Community Foundation · United Way Golden Horseshoe · The May Court Club of Oakville · United Way of Oakville · Boston Pizza Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Aqueduct Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.