Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Forest Hill Jewish Centre

The charity maintains a religious place of worship and educational facility promoting the study of judaism.

C$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$38k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$2k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$38k
C$37,860
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$37,860
THE CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SOMAYACH TANENBAUM CENTRE-COLLEGE OFC$2,480
02Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CANADIAN FRIENDS OF OHR SOMAYACH TANENBAUM CENTRE - COLL — C$4,719,385 over 3y, 53% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$263,982 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION PROGRAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$55,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetNETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL — C$8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANI DEVELOPING AND NURTURING INDEPENDENCE — C$5,692 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVI — C$1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL ASSOCIATION — C$144 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack and Doris Bistri…Zichron Binyomin Char…Jewish Foundation of …My Charity FundCanadahelps Canadon
Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable FoundationON8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · My Charity Fund · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 815349311:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Forest Hill Jewish Centre’s filings →