London, ON · Charitable organization
Forest City Baptist Church
Teaching and preaching the bible.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ETHNOS CANADA | C$1,200 |
| BAPTIST INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INC. | C$1,200 |
| BAPTIST WORLD MISSION CANADA | C$900 |
| BAPTIST MISSIONS TO FORGOTTEN PEOPLES | C$600 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BIBaptist International Missions (In Ontario) Inc.7× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +85%
- ECETHNOS CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +21%
- BBBIBLE BAPTIST TEMPLE4× · 2017–2020 · C$9k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- BIBAPTIST INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS ( IN ONTARIO) INC.one grant, 2019 · C$1k
- AIAwana International Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$200 · revenue -1%
- MBMARANATHA BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2022 · C$150 · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Propagation of the christian faith
Worship services bible study children's and adult sunday school and missionary support
Preaching teaching bible study baptism
Places of worship congregations parishes dioceses etc. -missionary organizations evangelism -religious publishing and broadcasting
Church service bible studies assign missionaries internationally and other church related activities.
Planting new churches supporting existing church plants
Preaching and teaching in accordance to the bible through church worship. bible studies educational studies and evangelism in inuvik aklavik norman wells tuktoyaktuk beaufort delta and sahtu regions. support missions and missionaries in…
Worship service weekly pastoral care visitation etc. children's youth & adult programs (sunday school bible studies kids programs etc) support missionaries in various countries
The mission dispersed money to missionaries and colleges and helped the work of an orphanage in india
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Wide New Testament Baptist Missions of Canada Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Awana International Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Baptist International Missions (In Ontario) Inc. ↗
- Who funds ETHNOS CANADA ↗
- Who funds BIBLE BAPTIST TEMPLE ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST WORLD MISSION CANADA ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST MISISONS TO FORGOTTEN PEOPLES ↗
- Who funds WORLD WIDE NEW TESTAMENT BAPTIST MISSION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds FAITHWAY BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Awana International Canada ↗
- Who funds MARANATHA BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bethel Baptist Church (Simcoe) · New Hope Baptist Church · Legacy Baptist Church · Heritage Baptist Church of Barrie Ontario · Pembina Valley Baptist Church Inc. · Crossway Baptist Church · Berean Baptist Church · Anchor Baptist Church · Vaughan Baptist Church · Airdrie Baptist Church · Église Baptiste du Berger de Sherbrooke · Gospel Light Baptist Church of Richmond Hill Ontario
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.