North York, ON · Charitable organization
For You Telecare Family Service (Futfs) Inc
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Arirang Age-Friendly Community Centre | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AAARIRANG AGE-FRIENDLY COMMUNITY CENTRE2× · 2018–2021 · C$850 · revenue ×17
- KCKOREAN CANADIAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO3× · 2018–2020 · C$550 · revenue +12%
- TMTHE MILAL MISSION2× · 2019–2020 · C$200 · revenue +70%
Funded once
- KSKOREAN SENIOR CITIZENS SOCIETY OF TORONTOone grant, 2018 · C$150 · revenue -32%
- CSCONTEMPORARY SENIORS HEALTH MANAGEMENTone grant, 2018 · C$120 · revenue -25%
- RIRAINBOW INFORMATION AND SOCIAL SERVICES INC.one grant, 2019 · C$100 · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1. senior support 2. family support 3. charitable organization support 4. homeless support 5. medical consultation service for non-ohip patients 6. phycotherapeutic counselling referral service 7. legal counsel referral service
The association is continuing its recreational and educational programmes to promote seniors' well being and better health in the gta region.
Social and recreational programs for senior citizens including crafts exercise day trips card games telephone security calls home visits safety and health seminars lunch gatherings.
Meals on wheels homemaking housekeeping volunteer services visiting safety care health and respite care transportation adult day program counselling and referrals to the elderly and their families assisted living and exercise and falls…
Provide multi-level care and services housing and activities for senior citizens
Serving the gta and york region dedicated to support the optimum quality of life for seniors ill disabled. in efforts to attain this goal we provide the following services: home support respite care friendly visiting social and…
Recreational social and cultural activities and programs for seniors.
Support of the Korean War Veterans and related programs provide seminars and support-women issues business issues- Senior programs promotion of cultural events and activities coordination with other ethnic Groups and Leaders Independence…
Lunch program for seniors; conversation group; variety of drop-in programs including arts & crafts chair stretch stamp club tai-chi mahjong esl music events
Seniors' services
SPRINT Senior Care is a not-for-profit neighborhood agency providing home support and community services to seniors in North Toronto. SPRINT purpose is to sustain independent living; encourage participation in community life; enhance the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hankooksaram/Canadasaram Seniors' Association in Gta and the most unlike its peers is The Milal Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARIRANG AGE-FRIENDLY COMMUNITY CENTRE ↗
- Who funds KOREAN CANADIAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN TORONTO ↗
- Who funds THE MILAL MISSION ↗
- Who funds KOREAN SENIOR CITIZENS SOCIETY OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds CONTEMPORARY SENIORS HEALTH MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW INFORMATION AND SOCIAL SERVICES INC. ↗
- Who funds BETTER LIVING HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HANGOOKSARAM/CANADASARAM SENIOR'S ASSOCIATION IN GTA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hankooksaram/Canadasaram Seniors' Association in Gta · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.