Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Niagara Falls, ON · Charitable organization

For the Needy-Not the Greedy Medical Equipment & Supplies Corporation

As a Not For Profit Corporation we endeavour to supply a wide variety of medical equipment and assistive devices to individuals or organizations in need when resources are available.

C$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$8k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$39k
C$4,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$486k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Autism Dog ServicesC$20,000
T.A.S.C. Therapy & Alternatives for Special ChildrenC$19,000
The Royal Canadian Legion Branch 479C$4,000
Canadian Council of Prov & Territorial Sport FederationC$4,000
Niagara Health FoundationC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$14k · 3 repeat orgsC$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +419% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

C$14k
C$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+419%
-20%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$39k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CANADIAN COUNCIL OF PROVINCIAL & TERRITORIAL SPORT FEDER
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$8k
  • TR
    The Royal Canadian Legion Branch 479
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$6k · revenue +5%
  • NH
    Niagara Health Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$300 · revenue +419%

Funded once

  • BS
    BP SERVICE ASSOCIATION (1ST BINBOOK SCOUTING GROUP)
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue -20%
  • SF
    SOCKS FOR CHANGE
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue -13%
  • SG
    ST. GEORGE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH LOWVILLE (BREAKFAST CLUB)
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zachary's Paws for Healing

We facilitate patients in hospital getting visits with their companion pets (dogs cats rabbits horses etc.) we certify and provide therapeutic animals to visit patients in hospital (dogs cats rabbits mini horses baby goats and other farm…

—
2
Partners With Paws Inc.

Training of service and therapy dogs to be provided to individuals in need

—
3
Save Old Souls Senior K-9 Rescue Society

Pet rescue and adoptions Animals are all checked by veterinarians and are then fostered homes until permanent homes are found for them.

—
4
Cypress Canine Society

The training of service dogs

—
5
Bandit Ranch Rehab

Animal rehabilitation

—
6
Hope Heels Service Dog Team Building Institute

Raising training and placing servcie dogs with persons with disabilities.

—
7
Prairie Animal Assistance Corp.

Rescue/rehabilitate special-needs animals at our animal sanctuary. educate people about positive training and animal welfare. help people with special needs- animal - assisted therapy / assistance animals.

—
8
Pacific Assistance Dogs Society

The pacific assistance dogs society's (pads) mission is to breed raise train and place assistance dogs for persons with a physical disability or who are deaf or hard-of-hearing and to support these client/dog teams for the working life of…

—
9
C.O.P.E. Canine Opportunity People Empowerment

1. match youth who are at risk of leaving school with service dogs in-training and show the youths how to train the dogs to become service dogs 2. conduct therapeutic visits in which youth/dog teams becoming 'reading buddies' for…

—
10
Niagara Action for Animals

Spay/neuter adoption and animals in distress programs assisting low income individuals with their pets vet care

—
11
Audeamus

Acquisition and training of service dogs

—
12
Pawsitive Sanctuary

The organization provides the follow services: - neuters spays rescues and treats injured dogs - adopts stray dogs - provides permanent shelter to all disabled dogs

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Royal Canadian Legion Branch 479 Niagara Falls Poppy Fund and the most unlike its peers is The B P Service Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAutism Dog Services — C$20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThe Royal Canadian Legion Branch 479 — C$6,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetBP SERVICE ASSOCIATION (1ST BINBOOK SCOUTING GROUP) — C$5,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetSOCKS FOR CHANGE — C$2,500 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetST. GEORGE'S ANGLICAN CHURCH LOWVILLE (BREAKFAST CLUB) — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLAST CHANCE HORS AND PONY RESCUE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNiagara Health Foundation — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

My Tribute Gift Found…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
My Tribute Gift FoundationON4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Source object 835093824:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on For the Needy-Not the Greedy Medical Equipment & Supplies’ filings →