Nepean, ON · Private foundation
Fonds pour la démocratie Matthew R. Scanlan Democracy Fund
Our charity gifts grants to five general types of qualified donee causes: Humanitarian; Democracy and Human Rights; Environmental; Clinical Research and Education.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| World Food Programme | C$1,500 |
| Médecins sans frontières | C$1,500 |
| Homes For Heroes Foundation | C$1,000 |
| Human Rights Watch | C$500 |
| Parliamentary Centre | C$500 |
| Amnesty International | C$500 |
| UNICEF Canada | C$500 |
| Western University Advancement | C$300 |
| Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Chicoutimi | C$300 |
| Help Lesotho | C$300 |
| Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami | C$300 |
| Ottawa Hospital Foundation | C$300 |
| Cystic Fibrosis Canada | C$300 |
| MS Canada | C$300 |
| Environmental Defence | C$300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 90% of grant dollars (C$14k). The 10% that went abroad (C$2k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 10% of all-years giving (C$2k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HRHuman Rights Watch2× · 2023–2024 · C$750 · revenue +179%
- AIAmnesty International2× · 2023–2024 · C$750 · revenue +2%
- UCUNICEF Canada2× · 2023–2024 · C$750 · revenue +60%
Funded once
- MSMédecins sans Frontièresone grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The canada west foundation is an independent non-partisan public policy think tank that focuses on the policies that shape the west and by extension canada. through our evidence-based research and commentary we provide practical solutions…
Wcs canada provides evidence-based expert guidance and policy recommendations to empower decision-makers to take transformative action for wildlife ecosystems and people. through our own research accumulated expertise and understanding of…
Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…
Created by Parliament in 1970 IDRC has been committed in supporting research in developing countries undertaken by the people of those countries for their own development. IDRC has five areas of focus: Climate-Resilient Food Systems Global…
World Wildlife Fund Canada is a national registered charity formed to collect manage and disburse funds through suitable bodies or individuals for the conservation of fauna flora forests landscape water soils and other natural resources in…
Prostate Cancer Canada has continued to responsibly invest the generous donations of Canadians to develop the most promising studies and minds Canada has to offer in the field of prostate cancer research. We have continued to ensure the…
Cooperation Canada is Canada's national association of international development and humanitarian organizations. Cooperation Canada brings together and advocates for effective Canadian international development assistance by convening…
United Nations Association in Canada engages citizens and decision makers at every level of Canadian society. It invests across generations bringing empathy-based educational resources and opportunities on health citizen education…
Brain canada is a national non-profit organization that enables and supports excellent innovative paradigm-changine brain research in canada. it plays a unique and invaluable role as the national convener of the brain research community.…
Advancing the health of Canadians by enabling the detection prevention and control of high blood pressure and its complications. Hypertension Canada delivers against its mission/vision by striving for excellence in three core service…
The David Suzuki Foundation works through science and education to protect the diversity of nature and our quality of life now and for the future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Canada and the most unlike its peers is Homes for Heroes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Help Lesotho ↗
- Who funds Médecins sans Frontières ↗
- Who funds Homes For Heroes Foundation ↗
- Who funds Human Rights Watch ↗
- Who funds Amnesty International ↗
- Who funds UNICEF Canada ↗
- Who funds Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami ↗
- Who funds Roberta Bondar Foundation ↗
- Who funds Bruce Trail Conservancy ↗
- Who funds Cystic Fibrosis Canada ↗
- Who funds MS Canada ↗
- Who funds Ottawa Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Environmental Defence ↗
- Who funds Parliamentary Centre ↗
- Who funds Western University Advancement ↗
- Who funds Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Chicoutimi ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · BenefAction Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.