Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Fonds de Bienfaisance des Pompiers de Montréal
1 - distribution de paniers de noel à des familles défavorisées 2 - achat et collecte de canettes pour ramasser des fonds 3 - dons à des organismes
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | C$4,000 |
| REGROUPEMENT PARTAGE | C$2,500 |
| BOIS URBAIN | C$1,250 |
| ASSOCIATION QUÉBÉCOISE DES VOILE ADAPTÉE | C$1,250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RPREGROUPEMENT PARTAGE4× · 2018–2023 · C$7k
- MMMOISSON MONTRÉAL3× · 2017–2019 · C$5k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2021–2023 · C$5k
Funded once
- CDCLUB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERSone grant, 2019 · C$5k
- CDCLUB DES PETITS DEJEUNERSone grant, 2017 · C$5k
- FDFONDATION DU QUÉBEC POUR LES GRAND BRÛLÉSone grant, 2018 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2023.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2023, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.