Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Fonds Climat du Grand Montréal / Greater Montreal Climate Fund
Invest and develop programs to accelerate the scaling up of low-carbon solutions in the greater montreal area.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$8k
- C$10k–50k9 grants · C$247k
- C$50k–250k7 grants · C$494k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EFFICIENCY CAPITAL INC | C$150,000 |
| FONDATION DU GRANT MONTRÉAL | C$83,000 |
| MULO | C$60,500 |
| ARCHITECTURE SANS FRONTIÈRE QUÉBEC | C$50,000 |
| CENTRALE AGRICOLE | C$50,000 |
| COALITION MOBILITÉ ACTIVE MONTRÉAL | C$50,000 |
| VÉLO QUÉBEC | C$50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$40,000 |
| CONSEIL RÉGIONAL DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT DE MONTRÉAL | C$32,000 |
| GROUPE DE RECHERCHE APPLIQUÉE EN MACRO-ÉCOLOGIE (GRAME) | C$25,000 |
| EXCELLENCE INDUSTRIELLE SAINT-LAURENT | C$25,000 |
| NATURE QUÉBEC | C$20,000 |
| RNCREQ | C$15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 36% of grant dollars (C$303k). The 64% that went abroad (C$541k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 64% of all-years giving (C$541k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FONDATION DU GRANT MONTRÉAL ↗
- Who funds ARCHITECTURE SANS FRONTIÈRE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU CEGEP DE ST-JÉRÔME - IVÉO ↗
- Who funds CONSEIL RÉGIONAL DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT DE MONTRÉAL ↗
- Who funds GROUPE DE RECHERCHE APPLIQUÉE EN MACRO-ÉCOLOGIE (GRAME) ↗
- Who funds NATURE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSITION ACCELERATOR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Trottier Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Trottier · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.