Skip to content
Canadian charities

St-Bruno, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Véromyka

Soulager la pauvreté en octroyant des dons à des organismes de bienfaisance enregistrés qui fournissent les éléments essentiels à la vie y compris la nourriture l'eau potable les vêtements et/ou un refuge aux itinérants aux femmes en difficulté et/ou aux jeunes; soulager la pauvreté en octroyant des dons à des organismes de…

C$345k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$120k
  • C$50k–250k4 grants · C$225k
C$25,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION CARREFOUR POUR ELLEC$75,000
FONDATION DU DR JULIENC$50,000
REFUGE DES JEUNES DE MONTRÉALC$50,000
LES PETITS FRÈRESC$50,000
MISSION OLD BREWERYC$25,000
FONDATION LA RUE DES FEMMESC$25,000
LE PHAREC$25,000
DANS LA RUEC$25,000
MAISON KEKPARTC$20,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.6M · 9 repeat orgsC$227k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

C$1.6M
C$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FONDATION CARREFOUR POUR ELLE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$355k · revenue +66% · 26% of their budget
  • RD
    REFUGE DES JEUNES DE MONTRÉAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$335k · revenue +22%
  • FD
    FONDATION DU DR JULIEN
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$280k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • LM
    LA MAISON TANGENTE
    one grant, 2022 · C$150k · revenue +21%
  • LD
    Le Domaine Forget de Charlevoix inc.
    one grant, 2017 · C$40k · revenue -27%
  • MD
    Musée de Charlevoixgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$7k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Maison Séjour

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentés ou en difficulté temporaire avec ou sans enfant

—
2
Fondation Carre Saint-Louis De Joliette

Recueiller des sommes d'argent sous forme de dons souscriptions publiques ou privées pour soutenir les activités et le projet du carré st-louis de joliette dont les objectifs sont: - offrir du logement et de l'accompagnement à des jeunes…

—
3
La Rue Des Femmes De Montreal

Offrir des services d'hébergement d'éducation de soutien et d'écoutes aux femmes en état d'itinérance et aux femmes pauvres en difficulté

—
4
La Maison du Pharillon

Accueillir d'héberger d'accompagner puis d'intervenir auprès de toutes personnes aux prises avec un problème de dépendance.

—
5
Fondation du Carrefour Jeunesse Emploi Laval

Promouvoir l'éducation en offrant des bourses et des prix à des jeunes de 15 à 35 ans dans le besoin afin d'encourager l'excellence et l'approfondissement de connaissances liées au marché du travail. promouvoir la santé en défrayant les…

—
6
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
7
Fondation Carrier-Fecteau

Cueillette du milieu de l'enseignement des parents et le monde des affaires. bénévoles-enseignants retraités parent et hommes d'affaires.

—
8
Auberge du coeur Le Foyer

Héberger et soutenir des jeunes à risque d'itinérance; - organiser et animer des ateliers sur des thèmes de société - aider à la recherche d'emploi référencement à d'autres organismes plus spécialisées aux besoin; - assurer un suivi du…

—
9
Fondation d'Aide à la Jeunesse

Organisation d'évenement afin de ramasser des fonds pour les enfants en difficultés et avec des besoins par leur différence

—
10
Fondation Les Amis de l'Ecole Jean Xxiii

Donner l'argent récolté à l'école jean xxiii pour la vie étudiante.

—
11
Fondation Gerard-D.-Levesque

L'organisme a pour objectif de venir en aide aux etudiants defavorises et faciliter l'acces a l'education pour tous les jeunes

—
12
Logis-Rap

Organisme d'habitation accueillant de jeunes hommes et femmes âgés de 18 à 30 ans à risque d'itinérance ou en difficulté socio-économique et offrant des logement à prix modiques.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Accueil Bonneau Accueil Bonneau Foundation and the most unlike its peers is La Fondation Le Phare Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION CARREFOUR POUR ELLE — C$355,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetREFUGE DES JEUNES DE MONTRÉAL — C$335,000 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetFONDATION DU DR JULIEN — C$280,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLES PETITS FRÈRES — C$195,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetLA MAISON TANGENTE — C$150,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetFONDATION LA RUE DES FEMMES — C$148,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetMISSION OLD BREWERY — C$100,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetDANS LA RUE — C$90,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION ACCUEIL BONNEAU — C$70,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMAISON KEKPART — C$40,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLe Domaine Forget de Charlevoix inc. — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLE PHARE — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMusée de Charlevoix — C$6,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLE PHARE — C$5,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FONDATION CARREFOUR POUR ELLE ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE DES JEUNES DE MONTRÉAL ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION DU DR JULIEN ↗
  • Who funds LES PETITS FRÈRES ↗
  • Who funds LA MAISON TANGENTE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION LA RUE DES FEMMES ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OLD BREWERY ↗
  • Who funds DANS LA RUE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION ACCUEIL BONNEAU ↗
  • Who funds MAISON KEKPART ↗
  • Who funds Le Domaine Forget de Charlevoix inc. ↗
  • Who funds LE PHARE ↗
  • Who funds Musée de Charlevoix ↗
  • Who funds LE PHARE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Fondation du Grand…Centraide Du Grand Mo…Les Moniales Carmélit…Les Soeurs Des Saints…Oeuvres Regis-VernetFondation Sibylla Hes…Fondation J.A. DeseveJewish Community Foun…TELUS Friendly Future…BenefAction FoundationRbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…Charities Aid Foundat…
La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater MontrealQC9.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Les Moniales Carmélites de Montréal · Les Soeurs Des Saints Noms de Jesus Et de Marie Du Quebec · Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation J.A. Deseve · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · BenefAction Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 815539382:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Véromyka’s filings →