Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Public foundation

Fondation Simple Plan / Simple Plan Foundation

Apporter un soutien aux divers organismes qui viennent en aide aux jeunes en difficulté out atteints de maladies graves.

C$284k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$70k
  • C$10k–50k14 grants · C$214k
C$10,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAR CHILD CANADAC$20,000
SICKKIDS FOUNDATIONC$20,000
FONDATION CHU ST-JUSTINEC$20,000
FONDATION DE L'HOPITAL DE MONTREAL POUR ENFANTSC$20,000
LE PHARE ENFANTS ET FAMILLESC$20,000
Individual grant recipientC$20,000
FONDATION PORTAGEC$20,000
Individual grant recipientC$14,389
Individual grant recipientC$10,000
FONDATION DAVID CHIASSONC$10,000
FONDATIN DE L'INSTITUT DOUGLASC$10,000
FONDATION DU COLLÈGE BEAUBOISC$10,000
LES IMPATIENTSC$10,000
FONDATION FIOCRUZ BRÉSILC$10,000
GRIS-GROUPE DE RECHERCHEC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$627k · 26 repeat orgsC$198k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
13

Total granted

C$627k
C$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+25%

Still filing today

85%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$139k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FONDATION CHU ST-JUSTINE
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$85k · revenue +77%
  • FD
    FONDATION DU DT JULIEN
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$65k · revenue +87%
  • FP
    FONDATION PORTAGE
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$50k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • LO
    LES OEUVRES JEAN LAFRANCE, QUÉEBC
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue +25%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE SANTÉ MENTALE DE MO
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue -49%
  • FD
    FONDATION DES MALADIES MENTALES
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue -69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
2
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
3
La Fondation Santé
—
4
Fondation Jonquière-Médic
—
5
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
6
Fondation universitaire de l'école des hautes études commerciales de Montréal
—
7
Fondation Jean-Michel Dufour
—
8
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
9
Fondation Travail et Santé Mentale
—
10
Fondation du Cégep de Trois-Rivières
—
11
La Fondation De L'ecole Paul-Bruchesi De Montreal
—
12
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is War Child Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION CHU ST-JUSTINE — C$85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DU DT JULIEN — C$65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION PORTAGE — C$50,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLE PHARE ENFANTS ET FAMILLES — C$47,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWAR CHILD CANADA — C$45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'INSTITUT DOUGLAS — C$35,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSICKKIDS FOUNDATION — C$35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU COLLÈGE BEAUBOIS — C$25,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HOPITAL DE MONTREAL POUR ENFANTS — C$25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINE DU MONDE CANADA — C$17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLES AUBERGES DU COEUR — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFONDATION JEUNES EN TETE — C$15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLE DOMAINE FORGET — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DU CONSERVATOIRE DE MUSIQUE ET ART — C$15,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFONDATION DE LA FAMILLE BRIAN BRONFMAN — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRESEAU POUR LA PAIX ET L'HARMONIE SOCIALE — C$15,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HOPITAL MAISONNEUVE-ROSEMONT — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRASER HICKSON INSTITUTE — C$10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFONDATION CHUM — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLES OEUVRES JEAN LAFRANCE, QUÉEBC — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFONDATION JEAN LAPOINTE — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DAVID CHIASSON — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetALLO PROF — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEXTENSION — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE L'INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE SANTÉ MENTALE DE MO — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION DES MALADIES MENTALES — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLES IMPATIENTS — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGRIS-GROUPE DE RECHERCHE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION NOUVEAUX SENTIERS — C$5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFONDATION DR CLOWN — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION CENTRE FRANCOISMICHELLE — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION TRIUMPH — C$2,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Fondation du Grand…Jewish Community Foun…Fondation Québec Phil…Fondation Philantra P…Fondation DesjardinsThe J W McConnell Fam…Centraide Du Grand Mo…Conam Charitable Foun…McCarthy Tetrault Fou…Centraide Québec Cha…Fondation Sibylla Hes…Fondation St-Hubert
La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater MontrealQC15.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Fondation Desjardins · The J W McConnell Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille J W McConnell · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Conam Charitable Foundation · McCarthy Tetrault Foundation / Fondation McCarthy Tetrault · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation St-Hubert

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 837305523:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Simple Plan / Simple Plan’s filings →