Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Saint-Georges, QC · Charitable organization

FONDATION S.G. Rotary

Dons à des organismes régionaux (moisson beauce etc.)

C$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOISSON DE BEAUCEC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$12k · 5 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

C$12k
C$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-48%
+47%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    Moission de Beauce
    5× · 2018–2024 · C$6k · revenue -75%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE SANTE BEAUCE-ETCHEMIN
    3× · 2017–2020 · C$2k · revenue -48%
  • MC
    Maison Catherine de Longpré
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$2k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • MD
    Maison de la famille Beauce-Etchemins
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue +11%
  • SA
    SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER CHAUDIÈRE-APPALACHES
    one grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue -1%
  • AC
    ADOBERGE CHAUDIERE-APPALACHESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accueil Grossesse Beauce-Appalaches

Visiter annuellement les écoles secondaires des comtés de beauce et bellechasse. aider et supporter la femme enceinte et ses proches

—
2
Collège D'Enseignement Général et Professionnel Bois-de-Boulogne

Dispenser de l'enseignement général et professionnel au niveau collégial

—
3
Logis Du Bel Age

Hébergement pour personnes âgées autonomes et semi-autonomes

—
4
C a P Accueil Jeunesse

Promouvoir les loisirs sans auprès des jeunes et de les amener à découvrir et développer leurs talents.

—
5
Cap Jem

L'organisme offre de l'hébergement à loyer modique pour les femmes enceintes ou monoparentales à faible revenu ainsi que des services d'aide connexes.

—
6
Guignolee De Chapais

Banque alimentaire

—
7
L'assiettee Beauceronne
—
8
Le Repas du Passant

Service qui favorisent la sécurité alimentaire

—
9
Fondation Maurice-Lamarche S J

Chaute- jeunes

—
10
Fondation Du Cegep Beauce-Appalaches

Soutenir le cégep beauce-appalaches dans sa mission éducative; remettre des bourses aux étudiants. donner de l'aide financière aux activités sportives culturelles et communautaires. soutenir les projets à caractères internationaux et…

—
11
Entraide - Benevole Du Haut-Pays

Services en maintien à domicile prainés fait par des bénévoles *popote roulante *acc-transport médical

—
12
Comite D'aide Beauceville C.a.B.

Dons de paniers de provisions vente de vêtements et meubles à prix réduits pour venir en aide aux plus défavorisés. aide aux sinistrés (exemple: inondation)

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Santé Beauce-Etchemin and the most unlike its peers is Festival Clermont-Pepin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMaison de la famille Beauce-Etchemins — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMoission de Beauce — C$6,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER CHAUDIÈRE-APPALACHES — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DE SANTE BEAUCE-ETCHEMIN — C$2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMaison Catherine de Longpré — C$1,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetADOBERGE CHAUDIERE-APPALACHES — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFESTIVAL CLERMONT PÉPIN — C$1,500 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCARREFOUR JEUNESSE EMPLOI — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCégep Beauce-Appalaches — C$800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFondation du Club Rotary de Québec — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

L'Oeuvre St-EdouardLa Corporation Du Pet…Centraide Québec Cha…Fondation Québec Phil…Fondation KomutelGaraga: Un rayon de s…Soeurs de la Charite …L'Archevêque catholiq…Charitable Gift Funds…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…
L'Oeuvre St-EdouardQC10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: L'Oeuvre St-Edouard · La Corporation Du Petit Seminaire de Saint-Georges de Beauce · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Fondation Komutel · Garaga: Un rayon de soleil Garaga: A ray of sunshine · Soeurs de la Charite de Saint-Louis Du Québec · L'Archevêque catholique romain de Québec · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 888014396:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on FONDATION S.G. Rotary’s filings →