Jonquière, QC · Public foundation
Fondation Richelieu Kénogami
Aide à l'enfance
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LES ENFANTS COMME LES AUTRES | C$5,000 |
| ST-VINCENT DE PAUL | C$1,500 |
| PATRO DE JONQUIÈRE | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LELes enfants comme les autres3× · 2017–2020 · C$15k · revenue +7%
- LHLE HAVRE DU FJORD INC.2× · 2017–2019 · C$14k · revenue +158%
- SDST-VINCENT DE PAUL2× · 2019–2020 · C$3k · revenue +206%
Funded once
- SDSt-Vincent de Paulgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +218%
- FJFondation Jean-Michel Dufourone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -93% · 49% of their budget
- FDFondation du Patro de Jonquièregraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +346%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse
Recueillir des fonds afin de promouvoir la compagnie jean duceppe
Analyse des organismes visant soit à soulager la pauvreté soit à aider les jeunes et attribution de dons à ceux-ci
Chaute- jeunes
Verser des dons à des donataires reconnus
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation Patro De Jonquiere Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Entre-Etres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centraide Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean Inc. · PayPal Giving Fund Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.