Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Prefontaine-Hushion

La fondation vise à faire des dons à des organismes de beinfaisance poursuivant des activités notamment dans les domaines suivants: la santé et la recherche médicale la lutte contre la pauvreté l'éducation la protection de l'environnement la promotion de la paix et les échanges interculturels et le développement de l'expression…

C$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAMEC$5,000
CLUB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERSC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$224k · 5 repeat orgsC$38k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +61% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

C$224k
C$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+61%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    ALLÔ PROF!
    4× · 2017–2021 · C$165k · revenue +336%
  • G
    GRAME
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$38k · revenue +98%
  • F
    FPC
    2× · 2017–2019 · C$1k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • S
    SOVERDIgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$20k · revenue +61%
  • FD
    FONDATION DAVID SUZUKI
    one grant, 2021 · C$8k · revenue +0%
  • PP
    PASSEPORT POUR MA RÉUSSITE
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trajectoire Québec

Activités bénéfices projets relatif à la mobilité urbaine projets relatif à l'environnement

—
2
Piétons Québec

1) romouvoir l'education concernant la sécurité routière et l'usage de la marche comme mode de transport en organisant des campagnes de sensibilisation des colloques des formations et des communiqués de presse pour le bénéfice du public…

—
3
Fondation pour la biodiversité et la faune du Québec

Pêche en herbe Agir pour la faune Amélioration de la qualité des habitats aquatiques (AQHA) Faune en danger Faune-Forêt sur terre privée Programmes d'aide financière aux véhicules hors route. (Volet II - Protection de la faune et des…

—
4
L'Institut international de Montréal pour l'environnement / the Montreal international institute for the environment
—
5
Nature Québec

1. la commission agriculture intervient pour rendre compatible la pratique de l'agriculture avec le maintien des écosystèmes dans les régions agricoles et les communautés qui en dépendent. 2. la commission aires protégées travaille à la…

—
6
ÉQuiterre

Mobilité et transport : nous faisons la promotion du transport actif collectif et partagé pour permettre à tout le monde d'effectuer ses déplacements sans recourir uniquement à la voiture solo. nous initions des projets et des campagnes…

—
7
Societe De Developpement Communautaire De Montreal (Sodecm)

Élaborer et proposer des pratiques urbaines contribuant à créer des villes écologiques démocratiques et en santé. l'expertise en matière d'aménagement durable des milieux de vie couvre trois champs : aménager l'environnement urbain pour…

—
8
Institut du Nouveau Monde

État du québec: ouvrage de référence publié annuellement sur la situation du québec au niveau politique économique éducatif culturel et social. école d'été d'hiver d'influence et itinérante : événements qui s'addressent aux jeunes de 15 à…

—
9
ÉCole Polytechnique De MontrÉAl

Université d'ingénierie distribution de bourses d'études aux étudiants développement de la recherche dans le domaine du génie projets de développement international dans le domaine du génie

—
10
Corporation De L'ecole Des Hautes Etudes Commerciales De Montreal

Plus de 36 programmes d'études en gestion couvrant trois cycles de l'enseignement universitaire. distribution de dons reçus en bourses aux étudiants ou à des chaires pour faire la science dans différents domaines. programme canadien de…

—
11
Les programmes éducatifs Ja Québec

Nous offrons gratuitement aux étudiants et aux institutions scolaires des prgrammes de formation économique et de développement de l'entrepreneurait tel que : en classe 'initiation aux affaires' pour les 6ieme année et la 1ere secondaire…

—
12
La Fondation Quebecoise En Environnement

Aider à la protection la recherche l'information la promotion et l'éducation en matière d'environnement.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropic Foundations Canada/Fondations Philanthropiques Canada and the most unlike its peers is The David Suzuki Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALLÔ PROF! — C$165,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetGRAME — C$37,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSOVERDI — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCULB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERS — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DAVID SUZUKI — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPASSEPORT POUR MA RÉUSSITE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEZ DORIS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFPC — C$1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Fondation Rossy the Rossy FoundationQC8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Fondation Rossy the Rossy Foundation · The Trottier Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Trottier · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 857482830:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Prefontaine-Hushion’s filings →