Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Phila

Dons à des organismes de bienfaisance dans le domaine des arts et de la santé

C$85k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$35k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$80k
C$25,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LES IMPATIENTSC$35,000
NEURO ('MCGILL UNIVERSITY')C$25,000
FONDATION HOPITAL SAINTE-JUSTINEC$20,000
UDEM RÉSEAU DES DIPLÔMÉS ET DES DONATEURSC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$534k · 14 repeat orgsC$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

C$534k
C$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+38%

Still filing today

100%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LES IMPATIENTS
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$247k · revenue +223%
  • LI
    LES IMPATIENTS
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$155k · revenue +31%
  • FH
    FONDATION HOPITAL SAINTE-JUSTINE
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$35k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • FC
    Fondation CHU Ste-Justinegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$25k · revenue +77%
  • FH
    Fondation Héros de tous les jours
    one grant, 2017 · C$20k · revenue -55% · 31% of their budget
  • FD
    Fondation du Musée d'Art contemporaingraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue +109%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
2
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
3
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
4
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
5
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
6
Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal
—
7
La Fondation Santé
—
8
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
9
Fondation de l'hôpital Jean-Talon

Contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité des soins et des services offerts à la clientèle et à la promotion de la santé dans la communauté en soutenant financièrement le développement de l'hôpital jean-talon et du ciusss du…

—
10
Fondation santé bien-être de l'Est de Montréal

Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…

—
11
Fondation De L'hotel-Dieu De Montmagny

Promouvoir encourager et soutenir les oeuvres hospitalières scientifiques et humanitaires poursuivies par l'hôpital de montmagny

—
12
Fondation Marie-Vincent

Centre d'expertise marie vincent chaire de recherche interuniversitaire marie vincent

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Groupe Le vivier. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
24/28
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLES IMPATIENTS — C$247,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLES IMPATIENTS — C$155,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetFONDATION HOPITAL SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEURO ('MCGILL UNIVERSITY') — C$26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFondation CHU Ste-Justine — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUT PACIFIQUE — C$20,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFondation Héros de tous les jours — C$20,089 over 1y, 31% of budgetFONDATION PALLIAMI — C$15,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetFONDATION SUR LA POINTE DES PIEDS — C$10,800 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUDEM RÉSEAU DES DIPLÔMÉS ET DES DONATEURS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrganisation Jeunesse au Soleil — C$5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFondation du Musée d'Art contemporain — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLES PETITS FRÈRES — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMission Bon Accueil — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFondation de l'Institut de cardiologie de Montréal — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLe Bon Dieu dans la rue — C$3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIDE TO CONQUER CANCER (CYCLO- DÉFI CONTRE LE CANCER) — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFondation du CHUM — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLE CHAINON — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPORT QUÉBEC — C$2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGarde-Manger pour tous — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLE GRAND DÉFI PIERRE- LAVOIE — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFondation Jean Lapointe — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGroupe Le Vivier — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFondation du Musée des Beaux-Arts de Montréal — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission Old Brewery — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMoisson Montréal — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…La Fondation du Grand…Centraide Du Grand Mo…Fondation Québec Phil…Fondation Famille God…Fondation Sibylla Hes…Fondation St-HubertFondation Bon Départ …Fondation Lise et Ric…La Fondation Rossy th…Fondation J Armand Bo…Centraide Québec Cha…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC12.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation St-Hubert · Fondation Bon Départ de Canadian Tire du Québec Inc. · Fondation Lise et Richard Fortin · La Fondation Rossy the Rossy Foundation · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-10-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 801538513:2024-10-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Phila’s filings →