Warwick, QC · Public foundation
Fondation P.-Rodolphe-Baril
Soutien financier aux organismes qui s'occupent des personnes âgées (fonds baril) et soutien financier pour les causes culturelles humanitaires et sportives(fonds Pierre-Ling).
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FADOQ-CLUB WARWICK | C$6,000 |
| CERCLE DES AMIS DE LA MAISON MUSICALE DE WARWICK(CAMMW) | C$3,000 |
| CENTRE D'ENTRAIDE CONTACT WARWICK | C$3,000 |
| CENTRE CULTUREL ET COMMUNAUTAIRE DE WARWICK | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CÂClub âge d'or Warwick inc.8× · 2017–2024 · C$50k · revenue -17% · 32% of their budget
- CDCentre d'entraide Contact8× · 2017–2024 · C$39k · revenue +218%
- CDcercle des amis de la maison musicale de warwick7× · 2018–2024 · C$16k · revenue -14%
Funded once
- FLFondation l'Ermitagegraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$50k · revenue +25%
- PNParoisse Notre-Dame des Monts(St-Médard)one grant, 2023 · C$5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.