Skip to content
Canadian charities

Laval, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Montoni / Montoni Foundation

1.

C$32k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$22k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉALC$10,000
THE WELCOME COLLECTIVEC$5,000
VALORA ASSOCIATIONC$5,000
FONDATION DU CENTRE JEUNESSE DE LAVALC$5,000
CENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE DE LAVALC$3,922
FONDATION DES JEUNES DE LA DPJC$2,400
CENTRE DES FEMMES DE MONTRÉALC$500
02Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE JEUNESSE DE LAVAL — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WELCOME COLLECTIVE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE DE LAVAL — C$3,922 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION DES JEUNES DE LA DPJ — C$2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE DES FEMMES DE MONTRÉAL — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Fondation Mirella & L…Centraide Du Grand Mo…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC8.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Mirella & Lino Saputo · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 768820706:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Montoni / Montoni’s filings →