Skip to content

Ottawa, ON · Public foundation

Fondation Miroir Foundation

Brenda strafford foundation: 'the opening minds through art program at the brenda strafford foundation brings joy and connection to older adults by offering a creative outlet that enhances emotional well-being.

C$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$8k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$30k
C$10,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$72k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARLETON LODGE (CITY OF OTTAWA)C$10,000
ROYAL OTTAWA PLACEC$10,000
BRENDA STRAFFORD FOUNDATIONC$10,000
SAUL AND CLARIBEL SIMKIN CENTREC$8,200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$256k · 8 repeat orgsC$125k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

C$256k
C$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+42%

Still filing today

88%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BRUYERE CONTINUING CARE - ELISABETH BRUYERE
    5× · 2018–2022 · C$69k · revenue +59%
  • TG
    THE GLEBE CENTRE
    4× · 2017–2021 · C$37k · revenue +49%
  • RO
    ROYAL OTTAWA PLACE
    3× · 2019–2021 · C$34k · revenue +24% · 25% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · C$17k
  • PR
    PERLEY RIDEAU VETERANS HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$15k · revenue +35%
  • CO
    CITY OF OTTAWA - PETER D. CLARK
    one grant, 2019 · C$15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St. Lawrence Lodge

Long-term care home

—
2
St. Joseph's Health Centre of Sudbury

Operations of long-term care faciliites

—
3
St. Mary's of the Lake Hospital

Provider of specialized care in aging mental health and rehabilitation

—
4
Grand View Manor Continuing Care Community

Operates a long term care facility plus 30 senior citizen apartments and provides services to an additional 40 senior citizen apartments.

—
5
SociÉTÉ Du Foyer Maillard

Subsidized residential care- the societe owns and operates a purpose built residence for seniors requiring complex long-term care

—
6
Maxville Manor

Operation of a 122 bed long-term care facility in maxville ontario along with seniors outreach services programs.

—
7
The Wexford Residence Inc.

The wexford residence operates a 166 long-term care home in the city of toronto scarborough area. the wexford also operates a 90 unit apartment building for seniors at low of market and is city subsidized. the wexford also operates a…

—
8
Mount St Mary Hospital

Long Term Care Facility

—
9
North Shore Health Network RÉSeau SantÉ Rive Nord

Hosptial long term care facility

—
10
Harold & Grace Baker Centre

Operation of a nursing and retirement home in toronto.

—
11
St. Bernard's Residence

Operation of a seniors' residence

—
12
The Saul and Claribel Simkin Centre Personal Care Home Inc.

Operation of a personal care home.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Perley and Rideau Veterans' Health Centre and the most unlike its peers is Osgoode Care Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRUYERE CONTINUING CARE - ELISABETH BRUYERE — C$69,470 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLEBE CENTRE — C$37,273 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetROYAL OTTAWA PLACE — C$34,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetVILLA MARCONI — C$23,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSALVATION ARMY GRACE MANOR — C$19,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPERLEY RIDEAU VETERANS HOME — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST. PATRICK'S HOME OF OTTAWA — C$14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL LODGE — C$14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOSGOODE CARE CENTRE — C$13,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRENDA STRAFFORD FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAUL AND CLARIBEL SIMKIN CENTRE — C$8,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Perley and Rideau Veterans' Health Centre — C$5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'OttawaON7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'Ottawa · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 834477184:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Miroir’s filings →