Skip to content
Canadian charities

Longueuil, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Lise Et Jean Fortin Inc.

Remettre des fonds à des donataires reconnus tels que définis au paragraphe 149.1(1) de la loi de l'impôt sur le revenue (canada) notamment à des organismes de bienfaisance enregistrés oeuvrant pour le soulagement de la pauvreté ou pour le traitement des maladies encore difficiles à vaincre.

C$175k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$70k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$100k
C$20,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROIX-ROUGE CANADIENNEC$100,000
FONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉALC$40,000
FONDATION HONORÉ-MERCIERC$20,000
FONDATION DE LA RECHERCHE SUR LE DIABÈTE JUVÉNILEC$10,000
LA FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTSC$2,525
PARKINSON OUTAOUAISC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$455k · 9 repeat orgsC$42k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

C$455k
C$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$90k · revenue +30%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'HOPITAL MAISONNEUVE-ROSEMONT
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$72k · revenue +19%
  • LM
    LA MAISON VICTOR-GASBOIS
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$40k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • AC
    ASSOCIATION COOPÉRATIVE ÉCONOMIQUE FAMILIALE DE LA RIVE-SUDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +54%
  • LF
    LA FONDATION ROCK-GUERTIN
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue +11%
  • LR
    LA RENCONTRE CHÂTEAUGUOISE
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
3
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
4
Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal

Soins hospitaliers

—
5
Fondation Santé de la Rouge

Le mandat de la fondation santé de la rouge est de développer avec la communauté des hautes-laurentides un partenariat qui lui permetta d'apporter aux intervenants les outils nécessaires pour offrir à la population de meilleurs soins…

—
6
La Fondation Santé
—
7
Fondation santé bien-être de l'Est de Montréal

Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…

—
8
Les Auxiliaires De L'hopital General De Montreal
—
9
Fondation de l'hôpital d'Argenteuil

Recevoir des dons ou legs pour les fins particulières du cmsss d'argenteuil dans le but d'aider d'établissement dans la réalisation de sa mission - organiser des campagnes de souscription et solliciter des dons en faveur du cmsss…

—
10
Fondation 'La Maison Notre-Dame Du Saguenay'

Contribuer au développement des activités médicales de même qu'à la promotion de la recherche sous toutes ses formes dans la région du saguenay

—
11
Fondation De L'hotel-Dieu De Montmagny

Promouvoir encourager et soutenir les oeuvres hospitalières scientifiques et humanitaires poursuivies par l'hôpital de montmagny

—
12
Fondation Chu Sainte-Justine / Sainte-Justine Uhc Foundation

Mobiliser la communauté pour permettre au chu sainte-justine d'accélérer sa recherche d'innovation afin de guérir toujours plus d'enfants toujours mieux et de leur offrir un avenir en santé parmi les meilleurs au monde.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre D'action BÉNÉVole Saguenay and the most unlike its peers is Parkinson Outaouais. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCROIX-ROUGE CANADIENNE — C$150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL — C$90,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HOPITAL MAISONNEUVE-ROSEMONT — C$71,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLA MAISON VICTOR-GASBOIS — C$40,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetL'OEUVRE DES SAMARITIANS — C$33,000 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetFONDATION HONORÉ-MERCIER — C$25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLA FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTS — C$15,155 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION RONALD DENIS — C$15,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLES CHEVALIERS DE COLOMB DU CONSEUL DE BELOEIL NO 2905 — C$15,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetASSOCIATION COOPÉRATIVE ÉCONOMIQUE FAMILIALE DE LA RIVE-SUD — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFONDATION DE LA RECHERCHE SUR LE DIABÈTE JUVÉNILE — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA FONDATION ROCK-GUERTIN — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLA RENCONTRE CHÂTEAUGUOISE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE JONQUIÈRE — C$2,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE CHICOUTIMI — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLES BARBAPARENTS — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPARKINSON OUTAOUAIS — C$2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE HOCHELAGA — C$1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA PATRO VILLERAY-NOURRIR LA RUE — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE PRÉVENTION SUICIDE FAUBOURG — C$190 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand Mo…Oeuvres Regis-VernetFondation Bon Départ …Fondation St-HubertFondation J.A. DeseveLa Fondation du Grand…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC10.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · Fondation Bon Départ de Canadian Tire du Québec Inc. · Fondation St-Hubert · Fondation J.A. Deseve · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 805895000:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Lise Et Jean Fortin’s filings →