Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Les Roses de L'Espoir / Roses of Hope Foundation

Dons à plusieurs organismes de bienfaisance oeuvrant au niveau de la recherche sur le cancer du sein ainsi que des organismes venant en aide aux femmes.

C$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$301k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$13k
  • C$10k–50k8 grants · C$194k
  • C$50k–250k7 grants · C$650k
  • C$250k+3 grants · C$801k
C$35,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION DU CANCER DU SEIN DU QUÉBECC$301,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADAC$250,000
ARBRES CANADAC$250,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND CANADAC$200,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED CANADAC$100,000
AQUA ACTIONC$100,000
CORRIDOR APPALACHIENC$100,000
THE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATIONC$50,000
LOOK GOOD FEEL BETTERC$50,000
BC CANCER FOUNDATIONC$50,000
FONDATION DU CUSMC$35,000
LA CUISINE COLLECTIVE HOCHELAGA MAISONNEUVEC$34,000
FONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINEC$30,000
FONDATION L'HÔPITAL MARIE-CLARACC$25,000
FONDATION LISE WATIERC$25,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.2M · 21 repeat orgsC$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
34

Total granted

C$3.2M
C$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+43%

Still filing today

100%
97%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$859k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ARBRES CANADA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$275k · revenue +33%
  • TP
    THE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$185k · revenue +59%
  • LG
    LOOK GOOD FEEL BETTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$165k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA
    one grant, 2023 · C$25k
  • MF
    MIRIAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k · revenue +18%
  • CD
    Centraide du Grand Montréalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$15k · revenue +59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
3
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
4
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
5
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
6
La Fondation De L'hÔPital GÉNÉRal De MontrÉAl the MontrÉAl General Hospital Foundation

Distribute funds to the benefit of the montreal general hospital mcgill university health centre and affiliated entities of mcgill university academic health centre and other organizations of the quebec health network for equipment…

—
7
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
8
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
9
Fondation universitaire de l'école des hautes études commerciales de Montréal
—
10
La Fondation Santé
—
11
La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation

The montreal children's hospital foundation is devoted to raising funds for health care research and teaching activities for children and pregnant women primarily for the benefit of the mcgill university health centre and qualified donees.

—
12
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation du cancer du sein du Québec/Québec Breast Cancer Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Governors of the University of Alberta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/64
Grantees still filing
47/64
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION DU CANCER DU SEIN DU QUÉBEC — C$1,927,712 over 7y, 8.7% of budgetARBRES CANADA — C$275,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA — C$250,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND CANADA — C$200,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION — C$185,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOOK GOOD FEEL BETTER — C$165,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBC CANCER FOUNDATION — C$135,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDUCKS UNLIMITED CANADA — C$100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAQUA ACTION — C$100,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCORRIDOR APPALACHIEN — C$100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUniversité McGill — C$75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFondation de l'Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont — C$72,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE DES FEMMES DE MONTRÉAL — C$52,500 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetMAISON LE PARAVENT — C$50,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFondation du CHUM — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetL'AVENUE HEBERGEMENT COMMUNAUTAIRE — C$44,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFONDATION DU CUSM — C$35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSunnybrook Health Science Centre Fondation — C$35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA CUISINE COLLECTIVE HOCHELAGA MAISONNEUVE — C$34,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetFONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$30,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversité of Alberta — C$30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFONDATION LISE WATIER — C$27,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFONDATION L'HÔPITAL MARIE-CLARAC — C$25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetLa Dauphinelle — C$17,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMIRIAM FOUNDATION — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCentraide du Grand Montréal — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DESJARDINS — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTRÉAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEUNES ALLIÉS DE MOISSON MONTRÉAL — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CANADIAN RED CROSS — C$6,706 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF BRITISH COLOMBIA — C$5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSICKKIDS FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUVEMENT SANTÉ MENTALE QUÉBEC — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFONDATION QUÉBÉCOISE DU CANCER — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION JEUNES EN TETE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOOD DISORDERS SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ONTARIO — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREVIVRE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFondation CHU Dumont — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACSM- MONTREAL — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFONDATION LE CHAÎNON — C$4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRECHERCHE EN SANTÉ MENTALE CANADA — C$4,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetIWK FOUNDATION — C$3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetL'AMARRAGE — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION LOGIS ROSE VIRGINIE — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Famille Lég…Fondation Famille God…Fondation Philantra P…Fondation J.A. DeseveJewish Community Foun…Centraide Du Grand Mo…Shoppers Foundation f…Wcpd FoundationConam Charitable Foun…Fondation Sandra et A…La Fondation du Grand…Centraide Québec Cha…
Fondation Famille LégerQC16.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Famille Léger · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Fondation J.A. Deseve · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Shoppers Foundation for Women's Health Fondation Pharmaprixpour la Santé des Femmes · Wcpd Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Fondation Sandra et Alain Bouchard · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 868223934:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Les Roses de L'Espoir / Roses of Hope’s filings →