Montreal, QC · Public foundation
Fondation les petits trésors Les petits trésors foundation
La fondation des petits trésors recueille des fonds en vue de contribuer à l'optimisation des programmes de soin et des services psychatriques aux enfants de 0 à 18 ans d'améliorer la qualité de vie des bénéficiaires de soutenir la recherche fondamentale et clinique et de sensibiliser le public sur la maladie mentale des enfants de 0 à…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$45k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$204k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$345k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITÉ MCGILL | C$345,000 |
| HOSPITAL RIVIÈRE DES PRAIRIES | C$204,000 |
| RÉPITS DE GABY | C$25,000 |
| LA MAISON DES PETITES LUCIOLES | C$20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 60% of grant dollars (C$1.3M). The 40% that went abroad (C$874k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 40% of all-years giving (C$874k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$370k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HRHOSPITAL RIVIÈRE DES PRAIRIES6× · 2017–2023 · C$764k
- MUMCGILL UNIVERSITY3× · 2019–2021 · C$527k
- LRLES RÉPITS DE GABY4× · 2017–2020 · C$96k · revenue -48% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- FDFONDATION DR CLOWNone grant, 2020 · C$33k
- LMLA MAISON DES PETITES LUCIOLEone grant, 2019 · C$28k
- CCCTTTBFone grant, 2019 · C$25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.