Skip to content

Victoriaville, QC · Public foundation

Fondation Les Amis D'Elliot

Versements de dons aux hôpitaux et clsc et autres organismes de bienfaisance

C$243k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$23k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$200k
C$8,765
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION HOTEL DIEU D'ARTHABASKAC$200,000
FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTSC$20,000
LA MAISON DU CLDI DE L'ÉRABLEC$8,765
RESTAURANT POPULAIREC$6,000
L'AMI-TEMPS DES BOIS FRANCSC$4,026
L'ENVOLC$3,813
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.0M · 9 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against -25% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

C$1.0M
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-25%

Still filing today

89%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • L
    L'ENVOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$401k · revenue +44% · 39% of their budget
  • FH
    FONDATION HOTEL DIEU D'ARTHABASKA
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$291k · revenue +27%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTS
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$121k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • FC
    FONDATION CLSC SUZOR CÔTÉ
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k
  • LC
    LE COLLEGE CLARETAIN DE VICTORIAVILLE
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -25%
  • CD
    CRDITED DE LA MAURICIE ET DU CENTRE DU QUÉBEC INSTITUT
    one grant, 2022 · C$884

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
L'entraide Chez Nous

Service de dépannage service de maintien a domicile

—
2
Centre De La Petite Enfance Des Hautes-Plaines

Service de garde aux enfants de 0 mois à 59 mois.

—
3
La ChacuniÈRe

Développer logement social supervisé pour personnes déficience intellectuelle

—
4
Logements Adaptés Casa

Sensibilisation de familles ayant un enfant autiste notamment en les sensibilisant à l'existence des reei sensibilisation de la population au besoin de développer des ressources d'hébergement pour la clientèle autiste.

—
5
Autisme Mauricie

Nous offrons des services de soutien de formation et de diffusion des connaisances sur les troubles sévères du développement dont l'autisme aux parents et familles des gens touches par cette problématique.

—
6
Le Petit Repit

Service de garde au domicile de familles en difficultés avec des enfants de 0 à 17 ans inclusivement afin de leur offrir un répit

—
7
Maison de répit l'Intermède

Offrir de l'hébergement et des activités à la clientèle (déficience intellectuelle et trouble envahissant du développement); offrir du répit aux parents des usagers; offrirécoute et intervention aux parents et aux usagers; solliciter des…

—
8
Centre de réussite éducative pour enfants La-le-li

Son objectif est d'offrir de services de soutien à l'apprentissage personnalisé aux enfants du primaire qui éprouvent des difficultés à l'école

—
9
Centre de la petite enfance Soleil joyeux

Service de garde pour enfant de 18 à 59 mois

—
10
La maisonnette des parents

Maison de famille ou on développe les habilitées manuelles ou on favorise la croissance personnelle et ou on accroit les compétences parentales. préparation des 3-4 aux apprentissages scolaires et finalement cours de croissance personnelle.

—
11
Centre De La Petite Enfance La Gatinerie

Service de garde éducatif à l'enfance pour 0-59 mois.

—
12
Vivre et Grandir Autrement

Elle offre des services d'enseignement et de garde dans le domaine des services sociaux pour les enfants autistes

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre De Stimulation L'envol and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Hotel Dieu D'arthabaska. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetL'ENVOL — C$401,204 over 7y, 39% of budgetFONDATION HOTEL DIEU D'ARTHABASKA — C$290,983 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTS — C$120,688 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION INTEGRATION SOCIALE — C$95,200 over 6y, 17% of budgetLA MAISON DU CLDI DE L'ÉRABLE — C$52,681 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetL'AMI-TREMPS DES BOIS-FRANCS — C$30,846 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetFONDATION CLSC SUZOR-CÔTÉ — C$24,075 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetRESTAURANT POPULAIRE — C$13,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetLE COLLEGE CLARETAIN DE VICTORIAVILLE — C$1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds L'ENVOL ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION HOTEL DIEU D'ARTHABASKA ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTS ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION INTEGRATION SOCIALE ↗
  • Who funds LA MAISON DU CLDI DE L'ÉRABLE ↗
  • Who funds L'AMI-TREMPS DES BOIS-FRANCS ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION CLSC SUZOR-CÔTÉ ↗
  • Who funds RESTAURANT POPULAIRE ↗
  • Who funds LE COLLEGE CLARETAIN DE VICTORIAVILLE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Famille François et Monique BourgeoQC12.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Famille François et Monique Bourgeo · Fondation Jacques & Michel Auger · Fondation Maurice Tanguay Inc. · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 842476541:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Les Amis D'Elliot’s filings →