Riviere-Du-Loup, QC · Private foundation
Fondation Leonne Ouellet
Fournitures équipement paramédical et accompagnement des personnes àgées et handicapées et des jeunes dans le besoin.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$22k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION DE LA MAISON DESJARDINS DE SOINS PALLIATIFS DU KRT | C$30,000 |
| COMITÉ D'ACCOMPAGNEMENT LA SOURCE | C$15,000 |
| FONDATION ANNETTE CIMON LEBEL | C$6,000 |
| CAMP RICHLIEU VIVE LA JOIE | C$5,500 |
| RESSOURCES D'AIDE AUX PERSONNES HANDICAPÉES | C$5,000 |
| MANOIR DES POMMIERS | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$45k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LMLA MAISON DESJARDINS DE SOINS PALLIATIFS DU KRTB5× · 2019–2023 · C$125k · revenue +90%
- FAFONDATION ANNETTE CIMON LEBEL8× · 2017–2024 · C$77k · revenue +58%
- MDMANOIR DES POMMIERS8× · 2017–2024 · C$42k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- MLMAISON L'AUTNIDgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +50%
- CDCOMITÉ D'AAOMPAGNEMENT LA SOURCEone grant, 2023 · C$6k
- MMMAISON MARTIN MATTEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$5k · revenue +74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Logements à prix modique pour personnes âgées
Logements aux personnes âgées en perte d'autonomie et services s'y rattachant
Maison d'hébergement pour des adultes autistes
Offrir de l'aide financière aux personnes handicapées à faible revenu de la mrc d'antoine-labelle pour des achats d'équipements spécialisés ou de tout autre besoin afin de maintenir une belle qualité de vie.
Logement et soins des personnes âgées en perte d'autonomie.
Camp de vancances pour personnes ayant un handicap physique et/ou intellectuelle
Logements pour personnes à revenus modestes.
Amasser des dons legs et autres contributions dans le but de bâtir une maison aux personnes atteintes d'autismes âgées de 20 ans et plus dans la région des moulins
Dons a la villa des plateaux résidence pour personnes âgées en perte d'autonomie défrayer les coûts d'équipements matériels animation sociale.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre de Vacances et d'apprentissage Loisirs de Saint-Cyprien and the most unlike its peers is Manoir Des Pommiers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA MAISON DESJARDINS DE SOINS PALLIATIFS DU KRTB ↗
- Who funds FONDATION ANNETTE CIMON LEBEL ↗
- Who funds MANOIR DES POMMIERS ↗
- Who funds RESSOURCE D'AIDE AUX PERSONNES HANDICAPÉES ↗
- Who funds CAMP RICHILIEU ↗
- Who funds École de musique Alain Caron ↗
- Who funds Comité d'accompagnement La Source - Club Rotary ↗
- Who funds MAISON L'AUTNID ↗
- Who funds Auberge la Clé des Champs ↗
- Who funds MAISON MARTIN MATTE ↗
- Who funds CARREFOUR D'INITIATIVE POPULAIRE RIVIÈRE-DU-LOUP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Défi Everest · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.