Skip to content
Canadian charities

Val-D'Or, QC · Private foundation

Fondation la Relève

C$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$951k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE LUNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉALC$5,000
CENTRE DE SERVICE SCOLAIRE DE LOR ET DES BOISC$5,000
FONDATION DE L'UQATC$5,000
CENTRE DE MUSIQUE ET DE DANSE DE VAL-D'OR INC.C$2,000
FONDATION LA PRESSEC$1,000
FRDJC$500
FONDATION DE LA MAISON COULOMBE VEUILLEUXC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$92k · 5 repeat orgsC$62k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

C$92k
C$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+35%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LB
    LES BANQUES ALIMENTAIRES DU QUÉBEC
    3× · 2020–2023 · C$60k · revenue +277%
  • CD
    CENTRE DE MUSIQUE ET DE DANSE DE VAL-D'OR INC.
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$5k · revenue +6%
  • FM
    FONDATION MARTIN-MATTE
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$2k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAISON DES JEUNES F.R.A.D. D'AMOS INC.graduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$15k · revenue +141%
  • CD
    CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE DE LA VALLÉE-DE-L'OR INC.graduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$10k · revenue +62%
  • LM
    LA MAISON DU BOULEAU BLANC INC.
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue -21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
2
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
3
Fondation des Auberges du Coeur du Québec
—
4
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
5
Fondation Maxime-Letendre
—
6
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
7
Fondation Jonquière-Médic
—
8
Fondation Le Bon Pilote
—
9
Fondation Anna-Laberge

La fondation finance quelques achats d'équipements du centre hospitalier anna laberge

—
10
Fondation le Piolet
—
11
Fondation du Cégep de Trois-Rivières
—
12
Fondation Hôtel-Dieu de Sorel

Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Du Centre Hospitalier De Val D'or Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D Canada/Percée DT1 Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
7/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLES BANQUES ALIMENTAIRES DU QUÉBEC — C$60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION HÉRITAGE DE LA CATHÉDRALE D'AMOS — C$20,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMAISON DES JEUNES F.R.A.D. D'AMOS INC. — C$15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE DE LA VALLÉE-DE-L'OR INC. — C$10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetLA MAISON DU BOULEAU BLANC INC. — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRESSOURCE POUR PERSONNES HANDICAPEÉS ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION DE L'UQAT — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE LUNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DE SERVICE SCOLAIRE DE LOR ET DES BOIS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION PAUL GIROUX — C$5,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE VAL-D'OR INC. — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRE DE MUSIQUE ET DE DANSE DE VAL-D'OR INC. — C$5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA COIX-ROUGE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION MARTIN-MATTE — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE LA MAISON COULOMBE VEUILLEUX — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRDJ — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation St-HubertRbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…United Way East Ontar…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Fondation St-HubertQC8.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation St-Hubert · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 774337331:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation la Relève’s filings →