Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Fondation La Clé

Octroi de bourses au secondaire octroi d'un financement à plusieurs organismes programme de branchement à internet gratuit

C$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$15,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRE LE BEAU VOYAGEC$15,000
CENTRE DES JEUNES BOYCE VIAUC$15,000
COUP DE POUCE JEUNESSEC$15,000
COMITÉ DE VIE DE QUARTIER DUFF-COURT (COVIQ)C$15,000
CORPORATION D'EDUCATION JEUNESSEC$15,000
CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE PETITE-CÔTE (CCPC)-SERVICES ÉDUCATIFSC$15,000
CENTRE D'AIDE À LA RÉUSSITE ET AU DÉVELOPPEMENT (CARD)C$15,000
ATELIER 850C$15,000
Individual grant recipientC$15,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 81% of grant dollars (C$689k). The 19% that went abroad (C$165k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 19% of all-years giving (C$165k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$689k · 14 repeat orgsC$165k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

C$689k
C$120k

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE PETITE-CÔTE
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$90k · revenue +21%
  • CD
    COUP DE POUCE JEUNESSE DE MONTRÉAL-NORD
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$60k · revenue +47%
  • CD
    COMITÉ DE VIE DE QUATIER DUFF COURT
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$60k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • CC
    CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE PETITE-CÔTÉ (CCPC) - SERVICES ÉDUCATIFS
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k
  • CD
    CENTRE DES JEUNES BOYCE-VIAU
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k
  • CL
    CENTRE LE BEAU-VOYAGE
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Maison Des Jeunes Le Refuge Jeunesse

Animation et loisirs auprès des adolescents

—
2
Maison Des Jeunes 'L'utopie'

Fournir des activités pour les jeunes de 12 à 17 ans.

—
3
C a P Accueil Jeunesse

Promouvoir les loisirs sans auprès des jeunes et de les amener à découvrir et développer leurs talents.

—
4
La Maison des Jeunes Actimaje

Opérer et gérer une maison des jeunes pour les 12 à 17 ans. nous offrons un service d'animation avec diverses activités proposés selon le goût et l'intérêt des jeunes qui fréquentent notre organismes. nous avons une grande salle de jeux…

—
5
Pilier Jeunesse

Promouvoir la prise en main des jeunes par eux-mêmes travail de rue animation - maisons des jeunes

—
6
Maison des Jeunes La Porte Ouverte

Offrir aux jeunes de 9 à 17 ans un lieu de rencontres et d'appartenance favorisant des projets sociaux culturels de loisirs et de sports afin que ceux-ci aient l'occasion d'atteindre le statut de citoyen par leur développement de leurs…

—
7
Jeunes Au Travail
—
8
La Maison Des Jeunes «Les Mayais»

Activités sociales éducatives et sportives pour les jeunes.

—
9
Maison Des Jeunes De Lamarche

Offrir un lieu animé pour les jeunes de 10 à 17 ans. favoriser l'intégration et l'implication. défendre et promouvoir les intérêts des jeunes en les sensiblisant à des questions qui les concernent selon leurs besoins susciter la…

—
10
La Maison Des Jeunes L'azymut Est * Ouest

Services aux jeunes (activités socioculturelles aux jeunes âgés entre 10 et 17 ans)

—
11
Avenue Des Jeunes
—
12
La Maison Des Jeunes Au Coeur Des Montagnes

Maison des jeunes

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coup De Pouce Jeunesse De Montreal-Nord Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Comité de Vie de Quartier Duff-Court (Coviq). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOND D'AIDE À L'ÉDUCAIDE — C$121,350 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetCENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE PETITE-CÔTE — C$90,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCOUP DE POUCE JEUNESSE DE MONTRÉAL-NORD — C$60,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetCOMITÉ DE VIE DE QUATIER DUFF COURT (COVIQ) — C$60,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetCENTRE D'AIDE À LA RÉUSSITE ET AU DÉVELOPPEMENT (CARD) — C$60,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetENTRE-MAISONS AHUNTSIC — C$45,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetPROJET HARMONIE — C$45,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetATELIER 850 — C$45,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetMAISON DES JEUNES PAR LA GRAND'PORTE — C$30,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMAISON DES JEUNES DE POINTE-AUX-TREMBLES — C$30,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetCORPORATION D'EDUCATION JEUNESSE — C$15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCENTRE LE BEAU VOYAGE — C$15,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCENTRE DES JEUNES BOYCE VIAU — C$15,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCREATION ETC. — C$12,607 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOND D'AIDE À L'ÉDUCAIDE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE PETITE-CÔTE ↗
  • Who funds COUP DE POUCE JEUNESSE DE MONTRÉAL-NORD ↗
  • Who funds COMITÉ DE VIE DE QUATIER DUFF COURT (COVIQ) ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE D'AIDE À LA RÉUSSITE ET AU DÉVELOPPEMENT (CARD) ↗
  • Who funds ENTRE-MAISONS AHUNTSIC ↗
  • Who funds PROJET HARMONIE ↗
  • Who funds ATELIER 850 ↗
  • Who funds MAISON DES JEUNES PAR LA GRAND'PORTE ↗
  • Who funds MAISON DES JEUNES DE POINTE-AUX-TREMBLES ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION D'EDUCATION JEUNESSE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE LE BEAU VOYAGE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE DES JEUNES BOYCE VIAU ↗
  • Who funds CREATION ETC. ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC11× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · ActionS pour le mieux-être de l'enfance · Fondation Du Club de Hockey Canadien Pour L'Enfance / the Montreal Canadiens Children's Foundation · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Valero Energy Foundation of Canada / Fondation énergie Valero du Canada · Fondation Dufresne & Gauthier · Fondation Jeanne-Esther · Fondation Desjardins · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 826787129:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation La Clé’s filings →