Skip to content

Saint-Sauveur, QC · Charitable organization

Fondation Kristopher Letang et amis Kristopher Letang and Friends Foundation

Venir en aide aux familles en difficulté plus particulièrement aux jeunes étant défavorisés sur le plan affectif matériel ou physique en leur offrant: nourritures vêtements meubles et autres nécessités quotidiennes.

C$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$88k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION DR CLOWN / DR CLOWN FOUNDATIONC$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$158k · 4 repeat orgsC$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +121% since the first grant, against +75% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

C$158k
C$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%
+75%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINE
    3× · 2020–2023 · C$65k · revenue +103%
  • GA
    GROUPE ACTION NOUVELLE VIE
    3× · 2018–2021 · C$48k · revenue +121%
  • FV
    FONDATION VÉRO & LOUIS
    2× · 2020–2022 · C$30k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • AN
    Action Nouvelle Viegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$20k · revenue +92%
  • FJ
    FONDATION JUSTIN LEFEBVREgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$15k · revenue +75%
  • FC
    FONDATION CLAUDE-DUROCHER
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k · revenue -67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation Dr Julien

Assurer la promotion et la défense des droits des enfants en milieux défavorisés par la pédiatrie sociale.

—
2
Fondation De La Fontaine

Aider financièrement et matériellement des enfants démunis fréquentant des écoles primaires et secondaires dans le but de soutenir et encourager leur réussite académique ainsi que leur participation à des activités scolaires et…

—
3
Fondation Dominique Ducharme

Levée de fonds afin de venir en aide aux jeunes plus démunis - contribuer a aider les organismes de lanaudiere reconnus dans la communauté et améliorer le sort de notre jeunesse

—
4
Fondation Pour La SantÉ Sexuelle Et Affective Jean-Yves Desjardins
—
5
La fondation Jean Duceppe

Recueillir des fonds afin de promouvoir la compagnie jean duceppe

—
6
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
7
Fondation Espoir-Guérison

Organiser des activités de collectes de fonds dnas l'objectif de soutenir la recherche pédiatrique. les fonds seront remis à deux chercheurs soit un de l'hôpital sainte-justine et un de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants.

—
8
La Fondation des Jeunes de la Source Vive

Plusieurs campagnes de financement sont organisées chques années pour faire fructuer les bénéfices et profits de la fondation et ainsi pouvoir donner un peu plus aux enfants.

—
9
Fondation Laure Gaudreault

La fondation amasse des fonds par le biais de souscriptions régulières et d'activités de financement. elle verse les sommes récoltées à des donataires reconnus qui respectent les buts de la fondaiton soit: aider financièrement les…

—
10
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
11
Fondation Dufresne & Gauthier

Analyse des organismes visant soit à soulager la pauvreté soit à aider les jeunes et attribution de dons à ceux-ci

—
12
Fondation Cirque du Soleil

Dons à des organismes de bienfaisance. favoriser le développement de la culture en soutenant des artistes et des organismes artistiques. soulager la pauvreté ( collecte de nourriture de biens pour distribution à des personnes défavorisées…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Justin Lefebvre and the most unlike its peers is Club des petits déjeuners du Canada - Breakfast Club of Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGROUPE ACTION NOUVELLE VIE — C$48,008 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFONDATION VÉRO & LOUIS — C$30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAction Nouvelle Vie — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION JUSTIN LEFEBVRE — C$15,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetFONDATION DR CLOWN / DR CLOWN FOUNDATION — C$15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION CLAUDE-DUROCHER — C$15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCLUB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERS DU CANADA — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater MontrealQC7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 854812419:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Kristopher Letang et amis Kristopher Letang and Friends’ filings →