Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Janine Bombardier

La fondation a été constituée dans le but de venir en aide à des oeuvres de bienfaisance reconnues dans différents domaines (éducation santé et autres)

C$535k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$25k
  • C$50k–250k5 grants · C$510k
C$55,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION VALLÉE DU RICHELIEUC$150,000
FONDATION DU CHUMC$135,000
FONDATION MISSION OLD BREWERYC$120,000
PROCURE DES MISSIONS MICC$55,000
FONDATION UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKEC$50,000
FONDATION YVON DESCHAMPS CENTRE-SUDC$15,000
PORTE PAROLEC$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$620k · 3 repeat orgsC$6.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

C$620k
C$6.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$295k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FONDATION DU CHUM
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$335k · revenue +57%
  • PD
    PROCURE DES MISSIONS M.I.C.
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$185k · revenue -33%
  • FU
    FONDATION UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$100k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • FD
    FONDATION DOCTEUR SADOK BESROUR
    one grant, 2019 · C$5.0M · revenue -48%
  • FP
    FONDATION PENSIONNAT SAINT NOM DE MARIEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$500k · revenue +205%
  • AS
    ABBEYE SAINT BENOIR
    one grant, 2022 · C$250k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
2
Fondation Le Bon Pilote
—
3
Fondation Jean-Paul Mousseau

Promouvoir la création la recherche et la conservation scénographique

—
4
Fondation pour la nature Asselin-Chicobi
—
5
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
6
Fondation Laurent Duvernay-Tardif
—
7
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
8
Fondation Histoire et Commémorations
—
9
La fondation Jean Duceppe

Recueillir des fonds afin de promouvoir la compagnie jean duceppe

—
10
Fondation Bonheur
—
11
Fondation CO2 Environnement
—
12
Fondation Jean-Michel Dufour
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation de l'Université de Sherbrooke-the Foundation ofthe 'Université de Sherbrooke' and the most unlike its peers is Les productions porte parole. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION DU CHUM — C$335,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetABBEYE SAINT BENOIR — C$250,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPROCURE DES MISSIONS M.I.C. — C$185,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetFONDATION J. ARMAND BOMBARDIER — C$185,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFONDATION VALLÉE DU RICHELIEU — C$150,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetFONDATION MISSION OLD BREWERY — C$120,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFONDATION UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE — C$100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION NATURE CANADA — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION YVON DESCHAMPS CENTRE-SUD — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCORRIDOR APPALACHIEN — C$12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPORTE PAROLE — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMISSION BON ACCUEIL — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Conam Charitable Foun…Wcpd FoundationCharitable Gift Funds…Aqueduct FoundationUnited Way East Ontar…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps CanadonCanadian Online Givin…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC8.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Conam Charitable Foundation · Wcpd Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Aqueduct Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 726905284:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Janine Bombardier’s filings →