Skip to content

Ottawa, ON · Private foundation

Fondation Ivonis Mazzarolo

C$270k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$127k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$14k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$129k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$127k
C$13,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANOSSIAN FATHERS (FATHER SHYAM)C$126,794
CANNOSIAN FATHERS (FATHER RAMIL)C$44,075
NEILI GRACIELA TALAVERANO LOPEZC$32,075
MISSIONARIES OF CHARITYC$30,000
SAINT THOMAS AQUIN CHURCHC$13,000
LE PONT BRIDGINGC$10,000
Individual grant recipientC$6,100
OSCAR ENRIQUE BARRETTO LINARESC$5,859
RIVERVIEW HEALTH CENTREC$2,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 73% of grant dollars (C$600k). The 27% that went abroad (C$218k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 27% of all-years giving (C$218k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
IndiaC$127k · 1 grant
TanzaniaC$50k · 2 grants
PeruC$38k · 2 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$505k · 6 repeat orgsC$313k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

C$505k
C$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+69%

Still filing today

100%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$215k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHEZ DORIS
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$40k · revenue +482%
  • LP
    LE PONT BRIDGING
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$37k · revenue +104%
  • ST
    SAINT THOMAS AQUIN CHURCH
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$31k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • WI
    WEST ISLANDE PALLIATIVE CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · C$50k
  • MU
    McGill University Health Centre Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$15k · revenue +175%
  • SH
    Sister's Holy Cross
    one grant, 2017 · C$13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Patrice

Administrer les biens et les services d'une paroisse de l'église catholique romaine conformément à la loi sur les fabriques.

—
3
La Fabrique de la Paroisse de le Bon Pasteur

Gestion des biens de la paroisse le bon pasteur pour le fin de l'exercice de la religion catholique romaine ( loi sur les fabriques - art. 13 lrq )

—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Agnes

Administrer les biens et les services d'une paroisse de l'église catholique conformément à la loi sur les fabriques. administrer les cimetières paroissiaux.

—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Jude

Administrer les biens et services d'une paroisse de l'église catholique romaine conformément à la loi sur les fabriques.

—
6
La Fabrique de la Paroisse de Saint-Michel

Organiser posséder détenir et administrer des biens pour les fins de l'exercice de la religion catholique romaine pour laquelle il est formé: célébration de sacrements activités pastorales enseignement religieux et activités caritatives.

—
7
La Fabrique de la Paroisse de Sainte-Catherine

Administrer les biens et les services d'une paroisse de l'église catholique conformément à la loi sure les fabriques du québec incluant le cimetière

—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Cecile

Promouvoir le culte et pastorale celebrer des offices religieux offrir un service de pastorale administration des sacrements et education de la foi catholique

—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Bon-Pasteur

Administrer les biens et les services d'une paroisse de l'église catholique conformément à la loi sur les fabriques. administrer le cimetière paroissial.

—
10
La Fabrique de la Paroisse Notre-Dame-de-Saint-Roch
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Hubert

Adminsitrer les biens et les services d'une paroisse de l'eglise catholique conformément à la loi sur les fabriques. administrer le cimetiere paroissial.

—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Saint-Pie X

Administrer des biens pour les fins de la religion catholique ramaine

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation du refuge pour femmes Chez Doris Inc. Chez Doris Women's Shelter Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Nova Hudson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSIONARIES OF CHARITY — C$310,000 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetThe Gold Cross — C$75,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCHEZ DORIS — C$40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLE PONT BRIDGING — C$36,500 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetSAINT THOMAS AQUIN CHURCH — C$31,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetMcGill University Health Centre Foundation — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERVIEW HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$12,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDIOCESE OF TIMMINS — C$5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetJules et Paul-Émile Léger Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBASILIQUE CATHÉDRAL STE-CÉCILE — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNova Hudson — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetParoisse Ste-Cécile — C$2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetShriner Hospital for Children — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds The Gold Cross ↗
  • Who funds CHEZ DORIS ↗
  • Who funds LE PONT BRIDGING ↗
  • Who funds SAINT THOMAS AQUIN CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds McGill University Health Centre Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RIVERVIEW HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESE OF TIMMINS ↗
  • Who funds Jules et Paul-Émile Léger Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BASILIQUE CATHÉDRAL STE-CÉCILE ↗
  • Who funds Nova Hudson ↗
  • Who funds Paroisse Ste-Cécile ↗
  • Who funds Shriner Hospital for Children ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Aqueduct Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 868967928:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Ivonis Mazzarolo’s filings →