Skip to content

Saint-Léonard, QC · Charitable organization

Fondation Italienne St-Joseph

Aide a l'enfance par voie de donation

C$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$427k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$3,500
LE PHAREC$3,500
CAMP CARITASC$3,500
CAMP L'ÉTINCELLEC$3,000
FONDATION LOGIS ROSE VIRGINIEC$3,000
STRONG KID-YMCAC$3,000
LEUCANC$3,000
CAMP AMY MOLSONC$2,500
CAMP PAPILLONC$2,500
LA FONDATION CANADIENNE DU REINC$2,500
Individual grant recipientC$2,000
LE BON DIEU DANS LA RUEC$1,800
Individual grant recipientC$1,500
FONDATION DU Y DES FEMMES DE MONTRÉALC$1,500
Individual grant recipientC$1,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 71% of grant dollars (C$175k). The 29% that went abroad (C$71k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 29% of all-years giving (C$71k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$237k · 26 repeat orgsC$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
3

Total granted

C$237k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-10%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • L
    LEUCAN
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$23k · revenue +4%
  • LF
    LA FONDATION CANADIENNE DU REIN
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$19k · revenue +23%
  • CP
    CAMP PAPILLON
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$18k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • S
    SOPAR
    one grant, 2020 · C$900 · revenue -10%
  • SC
    SOEUR COMPASSIONNISTE SERVICE DE MARIE
    one grant, 2019 · C$400
  • SC
    SOEUR COMPASSIONNISTE SERVITTE DE MARIE
    one grant, 2018 · C$250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation Repit Quebec

Venir en aide aux enfants handicapés en participant aux financements de séjours dans des camps de vacances adaptés pour les familles à faible revenu

—
2
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
3
Fondation Tremplin Santé

L'organisme a pour but de soutenir le développement d'environnements sécuritaires et favorables à l'adoption de saines habitudes de vie en contexte de loisir. soutenir l'accessibilité des jeunes de milieux financièrement défavorisés à des…

—
4
Fondation Centre Philou

La fondation centre philou est un organisme voué au mieux-être des enfants handicapés de 0 à 21 ans. elle recueille des fonds destinés à financer des activités de répit et de développement aux enfants et à leurs proches.

—
5
La Fondation Santé
—
6
Fondation Pause-Bonheur

Favoriser la réadaptation des personnes atteintes d'une maladie chronique principalement des centres d'hébergement st- augustin yvonne-sylvain villa alphonse-bonenfant et du fargy que du soutien à domicile des personnes âgées

—
7
La Fondation Le Rocher Ardent

Refuge pour les pesonnes dans le besoin aide et intervention soutien au logement urgence alimentaire

—
8
Fondation De La Fontaine

Aider financièrement et matériellement des enfants démunis fréquentant des écoles primaires et secondaires dans le but de soutenir et encourager leur réussite académique ainsi que leur participation à des activités scolaires et…

—
9
Fondation Les Amis De La Dauphinelle
—
10
La Fondation des Jeunes de la Source Vive

Plusieurs campagnes de financement sont organisées chques années pour faire fructuer les bénéfices et profits de la fondation et ainsi pouvoir donner un peu plus aux enfants.

—
11
Fondation Laberge LÉGarÉ

Promouvoir et assister des oeuvres de bienfaisance et de cahrité. appuyer des organismes en soutien à la maladie mentale et aux problèmes de dépendance pour les personnes de 15 à 35 ans.

—
12
Fondation Maxime Rocher Perrault

Nous donnons des fonds à des organismes qui viennent en aide aux personnes souffrant de problèmes de dépendances

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation de la maison du père and the most unlike its peers is Sopar-Bala Vikasa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEUCAN — C$23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLA FONDATION CANADIENNE DU REIN — C$19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP PAPILLON — C$18,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY FAMILY CHURCH FOR CAMP CARITAS — C$18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLE PHARE — C$17,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLE BON DIEU DANS LA RUE — C$10,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION AUTISME — C$9,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCAMP AMY MOLSON — C$8,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSTRONG KID-YMCA — C$8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON DU PÈRE — C$7,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE PLEIN AIR L'ETINCELLE — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPAROISSE SAINT- FRANCOIS — C$5,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMISSION DES FRANCISCAINS — C$5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOEUVRE CARDINAL LÉGER — C$3,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION LOGIS ROSE VIRGINIE — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFONDATION SANTA CABRINI — C$2,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOPAR — C$900 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEUCAN ↗
  • Who funds LA FONDATION CANADIENNE DU REIN ↗
  • Who funds CAMP PAPILLON ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY CHURCH FOR CAMP CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds LE PHARE ↗
  • Who funds LE BON DIEU DANS LA RUE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION AUTISME ↗
  • Who funds CAMP AMY MOLSON ↗
  • Who funds STRONG KID-YMCA ↗
  • Who funds MAISON DU PÈRE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE PLEIN AIR L'ETINCELLE ↗
  • Who funds PAROISSE SAINT- FRANCOIS ↗
  • Who funds MISSION DES FRANCISCAINS ↗
  • Who funds OEUVRE CARDINAL LÉGER ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION LOGIS ROSE VIRGINIE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION SANTA CABRINI ↗
  • Who funds SOPAR ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater MontrealQC10.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Fondation de la famille Zeller · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation St-Hubert · The Macdonald Stewart Foundation - la Fondation Macdonald Stewart · Fondation Jacques & Michel Auger · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Les Moniales Carmélites de Montréal · Fondation Jeanne-Esther · Les Soeurs Des Saints Noms de Jesus Et de Marie Du Quebec · Wcpd Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-10-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under educational orgs n.e.c..

Source object 886483999:2024-10-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Italienne St-Joseph’s filings →