Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montréal, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Famille Normand Beauchamp/ Normand Beauchamp Family Foundation

Faire des dons à des donataires reconnus selon la définition de la loi de l'impôt sur le revenu (canada) ou de la loi sur les impôts (québec) impliqués dans le domaine philanthropique.

C$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$110k
C$40,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$222k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL MAISONNEUVE-ROSEMONTC$40,000
SOCIÉTÉ DE SOINS PALLIATIFS À DOMICILE DU GRAND MONTRÉALC$40,000
CENTRAIDE DU GRAND MONTRÉALC$30,000
FONDATION NEURO-EFFICACITÉ QUÉBECC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$747k · 5 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

C$747k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+77%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CENTRAIDE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$295k · revenue +59%
  • SD
    SOCIÉTÉ DE SOINS PALLIATIFS À DOMICILE DU GRAND-MONTRÉAL
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$140k · revenue +34%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL MAISONNEUVE-ROSEMONT
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$130k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • FD
    FONDATION DE LA MAISON DES SOINS PALLIATIFS DE (...)graduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +43%
  • FC
    FONDATION CHU STE-JUSTINEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation de l'hôpital Jean-Talon

Contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité des soins et des services offerts à la clientèle et à la promotion de la santé dans la communauté en soutenant financièrement le développement de l'hôpital jean-talon et du ciusss du…

—
2
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
3
Fondation de L'Hopital Marie-Clarac

Améliorer la qualité des soins et des services offerts aux bénéficiaires de l'hôpital marie-clarac en effectuant des dons.

—
4
La Fondation Santé
—
5
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
6
Fondation santé bien-être de l'Est de Montréal

Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…

—
7
Fondation de l'hôpital Lasalle

Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.

—
8
Fondation de la fédération des médecins spécialistes du Québec

Dons à des donataires reconnus

—
9
Fondation santé et mieux-être Jeanne-Mance

La fondation a pour but de recueillir des fonds destinés à la communauté, à la recherche ainsi qu'à l'amélioration du milieu de vie de la clientèle des centres d'hébergements di CIUSSS du Centre-Sud de l'Ile-de- Montréal.

—
10
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
11
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
12
Fondation Palli-Ami

La fondation a été créée dans le but de donner un certain réconfort et d'humaniser les soins que l'on accorde aux patients atteints du cancer et en phase terminale. la fondation palli-ami offre un milieu de vie respectueux chaleureux digne…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation de la société de soins palliatifs à domicile / Palliative home-care society foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Chu Sainte-Justine / Sainte-Justine Uhc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRAIDE — C$295,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DES SOINS PALLIATIFS À DOMICILE — C$154,600 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ DE SOINS PALLIATIFS À DOMICILE DU GRAND-MONTRÉAL — C$140,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL MAISONNEUVE-ROSEMONT — C$130,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION LE CHAINON — C$27,100 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetFONDATION NEURO-EFFICACITÉ QUÉBEC — C$5,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetFONDATION DE LA MAISON DES SOINS PALLIATIFS DE (...) — C$1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION CHU STE-JUSTINE — C$1,074 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Philantra P…Jewish Community Foun…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Fondation Philantra Philantra FoundationQC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 842761181:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Famille Normand Beauchamp/ Normand Beauchamp Family’s filings →