Saint-Louis-De-Blandford, QC · Private foundation
Fondation Familiale Marc Bieler
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$13k
- C$10k–50k5 grants · C$75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA SOCIETE CANADIENNE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE | C$35,000 |
| THE CANADIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY LA SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA C | C$10,000 |
| FONDATION LAUBERIVIÈRE | C$10,000 |
| YOUTH WITH A MISSION FOUNDATION | C$10,000 |
| ENTRAIDE AGAPÈ | C$10,000 |
| PARTENAIRE 12-18 | C$6,000 |
| UPA DEVELOPPEMENT INTERNATIONAL | C$5,000 |
| SUE LA POINTE DES PIEDS | C$2,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$47k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EAENTRAIDE AGAPÉ4× · 2021–2024 · C$33k · revenue +45%
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSION FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · C$23k · revenue +6%
- UDUPA DEVELOPPEMENT INTERNATIONAL3× · 2022–2024 · C$20k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- LSLA SOCIETE CANADIENNE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATUREone grant, 2024 · C$35k · revenue 0%
- TCTHE CANADIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY LA SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA Cone grant, 2024 · C$10k · revenue 0%
- SLSUE LA POINTE DES PIEDSone grant, 2024 · C$2k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
L'organisme oeuvre dans l'aménagement intégré du territoire. sa mission est de «développer l idée pour conserver». développer le territoire selon une démarche intégrée et durable l idée de l accpetation sociale et de la gouvernance…
Notre organisme a comme ier secteur d'activité … d'aider la jeune … de la region de laurentides
Formation dans les milieux à risque. intervention sur le terrain auprès des clientèles vulnérables (jeunes et aînés)
Service d'aide aux jeunes de 16 à 35 ans à l'integration dans la vie sociale et professionnelle
Formation préparation à l'emploi orientation professionnelle formation en métiers non traditionnels
Au cours de l'exercice la fondation a effectué un don à un organisme reconnu rencontrant ses objectifs de venir en aide aux jeunes.
Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse
Élaborer assurer et réaliser des programmes et des activités de formation d'information et dont le principal objetcif est d'aider et d'accompagner les jeunes de 16 à 35 ans dans leur démarches devant les mener à une intégration au marché…
Mettre en valeur étudier et contribuer à sauvegarder le patrimoine du territoire décrit comme étant le ''pays de l'ardoise''
Organisme jeunesse actif en milieu rural qui offre a tous les adolescents un accompagnement qui les responsabilise qui dynamise leur milieu et qui développe leur sentiment d'appartenance envers leur région avec la contribution des parents…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upa Développement International and the most unlike its peers is Entraide Agape. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CATHEDRAL OF THE HOLY TRINITY ↗
- Who funds LA SOCIETE CANADIENNE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE ↗
- Who funds ENTRAIDE AGAPÉ ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UPA DEVELOPPEMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds L'AUBERIVIÈRE ↗
- Who funds CENTRE DE SPIRITUALITÉMANRÈSE ↗
- Who funds PARTENAIRE 12-18 ↗
- Who funds THE CANADIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY LA SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA C ↗
- Who funds SUE LA POINTE DES PIEDS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Québec Philanthrope · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.