Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Boucherville, QC · Public foundation

Fondation du grand défi Pierre Lavoie

Contribue à l'adoption de saines habitudes de vie chez les jeunes par l'activité physique et la saine alimentation ainsi qu'à la recherche sur les maladies héréditaires orphelines.

C$583k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k15 grants · C$275k
  • C$50k–250k5 grants · C$303k
C$15,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION DES CANADIENS POUR L'ENFANCEC$100,000
ASSOCIATION DE L'ACIDOSE LACTIQUE SAGUENAY LAC ST-JEANC$52,980
UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À CHICOUTIMIC$50,000
UNIVERSITÉ LAVALC$50,000
LA FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTSC$50,000
UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉALC$40,000
FONDATION DE MA VIEC$40,000
CHU SHERBROOKEC$25,000
CHU DE QUÉBEC- UNIVERSITÉ LAVALC$25,000
UNIVERSITÉ MCGILLC$25,000
UNIVERSITÉ CONCORDIAC$15,000
IWK HEALTH CENTREC$15,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO RESEARCH INSTITUE INCC$15,000
INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUEC$12,500
CHU SAINTE-JUSTINEC$12,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 66% of grant dollars (C$3.3M). The 34% that went abroad (C$1.7M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 34% of all-years giving (C$1.7M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$5k · 1 grant

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.3M · 28 repeat orgsC$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
87

Total granted

C$2.3M
C$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+18%

Still filing today

96%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FONDATION DES CANADIENS POUR L'ENFANCE
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$311k · revenue +88%
  • IC
    Institut Cardiologie de Montréal
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$265k · revenue +47%
  • LF
    LA FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTS
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$218k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2020 · C$834k
  • LF
    La Fondation de l'Hôpital général de Montréal
    one grant, 2018 · C$100k · revenue +9%
  • FD
    FONDATION DES CANADIENS POURS L'ENFANCE
    one grant, 2023 · C$89k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Universite Du Quebec

Enseignement et recherche universitaire

—
2
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociauxde la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec
—
3
Collège de montréal

Enseignement secondaire privé

—
4
Cegep Du Vieux Montreal
—
5
Groupe d'Éducation-Santé du Québec
—
6
U.C.M.U. Montérégie
—
7
Cégep de Sherbrooke

Nous tenons un collège d'enseignement général et professionnel

—
8
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
9
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
10
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociauxde l'Est-de-L'Île-de-Montréal

Fournir des soins de santé aux bénéficaires hospitalisés hébergés et/ou en consultation externe

—
11
UniversitÉ Du QuÉBec En Abitibi-TÉMiscamingue

Enseignement universitaire développement d'activité de recherche

—
12
Cégep de Lévis
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Pour Les Eleves De Montreal and the most unlike its peers is Mon Resto Saint-Michel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/69
Grantees still filing
49/69
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION DES CANADIENS POUR L'ENFANCE — C$311,175 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetInstitut Cardiologie de Montréal — C$265,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLA FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTS — C$217,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetASOOCIATION DE L'ACIDOSE LACTIQUE SAGUENAY LAC ST-JEAN — C$209,904 over 4y, 70% of budgetUniversité du Québec à Montreal — C$190,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversité Laval — C$160,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À CHICOUTIMI — C$135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversité de Sherbrooke — C$132,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLa Fondation de l'Hôpital général de Montréal — C$100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHôpital Sainte-Justine — C$97,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE MA VIE — C$88,995 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal — C$75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITÉ MCGILL — C$60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInstitut de recherche du Centre Universitaire de Santé McGil — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFondation de l'Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHU de Québec — C$50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFondation du CHU de Québec — C$47,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRegroupement Québécois Éducative des maladies orphelines — C$35,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetCHU SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA / RÉSEAU CANADIEN SUR LES MAL — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversité d'Ottawa — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRO DE CHARLESBOURG — C$22,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFIBROSE KYSTIQUE CANADA — C$20,710 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversité de Montréal — C$17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInstitut de recherches cliniques de Montréal — C$17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation de la Commission scolaire de Montréal — C$15,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCommission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île — C$15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIWK HEALTH CENTRE — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO RESEARCH INSTITUE INC — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommission scolaire de la Vallée-des-Tisserands — C$15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITÉ CONCORDIA — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommission scolaire Harricana — C$14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DE SERVICES SCOLAIRE DES AFFLUENTS — C$13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DE SERVICES SCOLAIRE DES SOMMETS — C$13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE EN COMMUNAUTÉ DE — C$12,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetL'AMIE DU QUARTIER — C$12,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMAISON DES FAMILLES DE GRANBY — C$12,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetINSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE — C$12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommission scolaire du Chemin-du-Roy — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMon Resto SAint-Michel — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATURE QUÉBEC — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFonds de dotation Santé Jonquière Inc. — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCAB MISSIQUOI-NORD — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFondation de la Réussite Éducative au Coeur-des-Vallées — C$10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE LE TANDEM — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetL'ANCRE DES JEUNES — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFondation de l'École secondaire Val-Maurice — C$10,000 over 1y, 77% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Du Club de …Société de Recherche …Fondation Brain Canad…Fondation Lucie et An…Music Education Chari…Canadian Cancer Socie…Breakthrough T1D Cana…Td Friends of the Env…Diabetes Canada Diabè…Heart and Stroke Foun…Centraide Estrie (Con…Centraide Du Grand Mo…
Fondation Du Club de Hockey Canadien Pour L'Enfance / the Montreal Canadiens Children's FoundationQC20.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Du Club de Hockey Canadien Pour L'Enfance / the Montreal Canadiens Children's Foundation · Société de Recherche Sur le Cancer/Cancer Research Society · Fondation Brain Canada / Brain Canada Foundation · Fondation Lucie et André Chagnon · Music Education Charity of Canada · Canadian Cancer Society - Société Canadienne Du Cancer · Breakthrough T1D Canada/Percée DT1 Canada · Td Friends of the Environment Foundation · Diabetes Canada Diabète Canada · Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Fondation Des Maladies Du Coeur Et de L'Avc Du Canada · Centraide Estrie (Conseil Régional de Bien-Être de Sherbrooke) · Centraide Du Grand Montréal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-09-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 828684290:2024-09-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation du grand défi Pierre Lavoie’s filings →