Québec, QC · Private foundation
Fondation Denise Saint-Pierre
Soutien à des projets de formation perfectionnement et ressourcement développés par les diocèses du québec et l'office de catéchèse du québec concernant la 'formation à la vie chretienne' de foi catholique des enfants de 6-12 ans et de leurs catéchètes.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OFFICE DE CATÉCHÈSE DU QUÉBEC | C$5,150 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DDDIOCÈSE DE QUÉBEC4× · 2017–2023 · C$70k · revenue +172%
- DDDIOCÈSE DE SAINT-JÉRÔME3× · 2017–2023 · C$46k · revenue +188%
- DDDIOCÈSE DE SAINTE-ANNE-DE-LA-POCATIÈRE3× · 2017–2023 · C$46k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- FNFabrique Notre-Dame-de-Foygraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +105%
- FNFabrique Notre-Dame-de-Beauportone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -28%
- FSFabrique Saint-Agapitgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +454%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Église de la religion catholique romaine
Église catholique
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Église catholique
Exercice de la religion catholique
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is L'ÉVÊQue Catholique Romain De Rouyn-Noranda and the most unlike its peers is Secrétariat de l'action Catholique. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OFFICE DE CATÉCHÈSE DU QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE MONT-LAURIER ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE SAINT-JÉRÔME ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE SAINTE-ANNE-DE-LA-POCATIÈRE ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE GASPÉ ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE D'AMOS ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE VALLEYFIELD ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE RIMOUSKI ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE ROUYN-NORANDA ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE SHERBROOKE ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE ST-HYACINTHE ↗
- Who funds DIOCÈSE DE BAIE-COMEAU ↗
- Who funds Fabrique Notre-Dame-de-Foy ↗
- Who funds Fabrique Notre-Dame-de-Beauport ↗
- Who funds Fabrique Saint-Agapit ↗
- Who funds Fabrique Saint-Chales-Borromée ↗
- Who funds Fabrique Sainte-Marie-de-Beauce ↗
- Who funds Fabrique Saint-Augustin-de-Desmaures ↗
- Who funds Fabrique Saint-Joseph-de-Lévis ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Conseil du Patrimoine Religieux du Québec / Québec Religious Heritage Council · Les Soeurs de la Charité de Québec · Les Soeurs de la Charité de Québec · Province de Saint-Joseph des servantes du Saint-Coeur de Marie · Les Oblates de Bethanie · Congrégation De Notre-Dame Du Québec · Les Soeurs de Sainte-Jeanne D'Arc · Les Dominicaines Missionnaires Adoratrices · Soeurs de la Charite de Saint-Louis Du Québec · Freres de Saint-Gabriel Du Canada · Les Augustines de la Miséricorde de Jésus du Monastère Saint-Augustin · Fondation Québec Philanthrope
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.