Mont St-Hilaire, QC · Private foundation
Fondation Denis Ouellet Et Suzanne Fournier
Verser des dons à des organismes reconnus
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPITAL GÉNÉRAL JUIF (RECHERCHE) | C$2,000 |
| CENTRE RECHERCHE MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT SANTE | C$1,500 |
| HOPITAL GÉNÉRAL JUIF (SOINS PALLIATIFS) | C$1,000 |
| IRCM | C$500 |
| LA MAISON VICTOR GADBOIS | C$500 |
| MOULIN LA LORRAINE | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HGHOPÎTAL GÉNÉRAL JUIF (RECHERCHE)5× · 2017–2024 · C$20k · revenue +31%
- CRCENTRE RECHERCHE MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT SANTE DE LA VISION ET5× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +19%
- PQParkinson Québec3× · 2017–2019 · C$5k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- FDFondation des Maladies du Coeurgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +41%
- FLFONDATION LA PRESSEone grant, 2021 · C$1k
- MSMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY OF CANADAone grant, 2018 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal
La fondation de l'institut de cardiologie de ontréal recueille et administre des fonds pour soutenir la recherche la prévention et l'enseignement prodigués par l'institut de cardiologie de montréal. elle encourage ainsi l'excellence d'une…
Make grants directed to the care and treatment of respiratory diseases at the mcgill university health centre
Distribute funds to the benefit of the montreal general hospital mcgill university health centre and affiliated entities of mcgill university academic health centre and other organizations of the quebec health network for equipment…
Centre d'expertise marie vincent chaire de recherche interuniversitaire marie vincent
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ms Canada Sp Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPÎTAL GÉNÉRAL JUIF (RECHERCHE) ↗
- Who funds CENTRE RECHERCHE MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT SANTE DE LA VISION ET ↗
- Who funds Parkinson Québec ↗
- Who funds LA MAISON VICTOR GADBOIS ↗
- Who funds MOULIN LA LORRAINE ↗
- Who funds MONTREAL CHILDREN HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Fondation des Maladies du Coeur ↗
- Who funds FONDATION LA PRESSE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DES ETOILES ↗
- Who funds Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada ↗
- Who funds IRCM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Conam Charitable Foundation · Fondation Lise et Richard Fortin · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.