Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Public foundation

Fondation de la Recherche Pédiatrique/ Pediatric Research Foundation

La Fondation de la recherche pédiatrique a pour seule activité de verser des fonds à des donataires reconnus par les lois fiscales afin d’encourager la formation et le soutien d’étudiants et de chercheurs prometteurs.

C$700k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$186k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$77k
  • C$50k–250k4 grants · C$623k
C$115,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fondation du CHUSC$186,000
Fondation de l hôpital de Montréal pour enfantsC$166,000
Fondation CHU Sainte-JustineC$155,750
Fondation du CHU de QuébecC$115,000
FRQSC$42,250
Université LavalC$20,000
IR CUSMC$15,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 87% of grant dollars (C$5.4M). The 13% that went abroad (C$810k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 13% of all-years giving (C$810k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$5.9M · 7 repeat orgsC$344k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

C$5.9M
C$309k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+44%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    Fondation de l'Hopital de Montréal pour enfants
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$1.7M · revenue +66%
  • FC
    Fondation CHU Sainte-Justine
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$1.5M · revenue +64%
  • FD
    Fondation du CHUS
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.2M · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • FD
    Fonds de recherche du Québec Santé
    one grant, 2017 · C$185k
  • FI
    Fondation IUSM Douglasgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$100k · revenue +44%
  • CD
    CIUSS de la Capitale-Nationale
    one grant, 2022 · C$23k · revenue -36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
2
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
3
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
4
Fondation du Centre universitaire de santé McGill McGill University Health Centre Foundation

To receive and invest funds and apply them to health care activities research and the teaching mandate for the benefit of the mcgill university health centre it's related institutions and other qualified donees with a similar mission.

—
5
Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal

Soins hospitaliers

—
6
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
7
La Fondation De L'hÔPital GÉNÉRal De MontrÉAl the MontrÉAl General Hospital Foundation

Distribute funds to the benefit of the montreal general hospital mcgill university health centre and affiliated entities of mcgill university academic health centre and other organizations of the quebec health network for equipment…

—
8
Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation

La fondation de l'institut de cardiologie de ontréal recueille et administre des fonds pour soutenir la recherche la prévention et l'enseignement prodigués par l'institut de cardiologie de montréal. elle encourage ainsi l'excellence d'une…

—
9
Fondation Du Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal

La foundation du chum a pour objectifs d'établir d'organiser de maintenir d'administrer et de développer des fonds pour promouvoir l'amélioration des soins l'excellence de l'enseignement et l'avancement de la recherche en général au centre…

—
10
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire De Cardiologie Et De Pneumologie De QuÉBec

La fondation a pour objectif de percevoir les dons de gérer les fonds au profit de l'institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de québec - université laval.

—
11
La fondation de l'institut thoracique de Montréal / the Montréal Chest Institute Foundation

Make grants directed to the care and treatment of respiratory diseases at the mcgill university health centre

—
12
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation du Chu de Québec and the most unlike its peers is UniversitÉ Laval. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFondation de l'Hopital de Montréal pour enfants — C$1,654,473 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetFondation CHU Sainte-Justine — C$1,532,847 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetFondation du CHUS — C$1,189,154 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetFondation du CHU de Québec — C$471,968 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLE RÉSEAU D'ACTION EN SANTÉ CARDIOVASCULAIRE — C$370,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetFondation IUSM Douglas — C$100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCIUSS de la Capitale-Nationale — C$23,492 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversité Laval — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIR CUSM — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fondation de l'Hopital de Montréal pour enfants ↗
  • Who funds Fondation CHU Sainte-Justine ↗
  • Who funds Fondation du CHUS ↗
  • Who funds Fondation du CHU de Québec ↗
  • Who funds LE RÉSEAU D'ACTION EN SANTÉ CARDIOVASCULAIRE ↗
  • Who funds Fondation IUSM Douglas ↗
  • Who funds CIUSS de la Capitale-Nationale ↗
  • Who funds Université Laval ↗
  • Who funds IR CUSM ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 891993545:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation de la Recherche Pédiatrique/ Pediatric Research’s filings →