Saint-Jerome, QC · Public foundation
Fondation de l'Association des recycleurs de pièces d'autos et de camions inc.
L'organisme a pour but d'apporter une aide financière à des personnes éprouvées par la maladie par un aménagement adapté de leur domicile.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION SUR LA POINTE DES PIEDS | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FRFondation Rêve d'enfant3× · 2017–2019 · C$6k · revenue +9%
- SCSociété canadienne du cancer4× · 2017–2021 · C$5k · revenue +6%
- FLFondation L'Intermèdes2× · 2017–2018 · C$3k · revenue +815%
Funded once
- LPLe Phare Enfants Famillesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +50%
- FDFondation du centre hospitalier Mont-Lauriergraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +111%
- FCFondation Christian Vachongraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +523%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
Mobiliser la communauté pour permettre au chu sainte-justine d'accélérer sa recherche d'innovation afin de guérir toujours plus d'enfants toujours mieux et de leur offrir un avenir en santé parmi les meilleurs au monde.
Contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité des soins et des services offerts à la clientèle et à la promotion de la santé dans la communauté en soutenant financièrement le développement de l'hôpital jean-talon et du ciusss du…
Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.
L'objectif est d'aider les jeunes sportifs attients de limitations physiques
La fondation finance quelques achats d'équipements du centre hospitalier anna laberge
Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal
Supporter diverses causes en lien avec la santé et le bien-être de la communauté.
Améliorer la qualité des soins et des services offerts aux bénéficiaires de l'hôpital marie-clarac en effectuant des dons.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation du centre hospitalier Mont-Laurier and the most unlike its peers is FamiJeunes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Fondation Rêve d'enfant ↗
- Who funds Société canadienne du cancer ↗
- Who funds Le Phare Enfants Familles ↗
- Who funds Fondation du centre hospitalier Mont-Laurier ↗
- Who funds Fondation L'Intermèdes ↗
- Who funds Fondation Hopital Pierre Boucher ↗
- Who funds Fondation Christian Vachon ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU GRAND DÉFI PIERRE LAVOIE ↗
- Who funds Fondation Paul Pineault pour soulager l'alzheimer ↗
- Who funds FONDATION SUR LA POINTE DES PIEDS ↗
- Who funds Fondation du centre hospitalier de Granby ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DES POMPIERS DU QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE ST-JÉRÔME ↗
- Who funds COMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE DE ST-HIPPOLYTE ↗
- Who funds Famijeunes ↗
- Who funds FONATION DE MALADIES DU COEUR ↗
- Who funds Fondation régionale pour la santé de Trois-Rivières ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation St-Hubert · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Wcpd Foundation · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Fondation Desjardins · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.