Sherbrooke, QC · Private foundation
Fondation Daniel Roy Inc
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k7 grants · C$17k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARTAGE ST FRANCOIS | C$15,000 |
| LA GRANDE TABLE | C$5,000 |
| MAISON JEUNES EST | C$5,000 |
| CENTRE D'ENTRAIDE PLUS DE L'ESTRIE | C$3,500 |
| CORPORATION ROUTE D'ENFANTS | C$1,500 |
| FONDATION DU CHUS | C$1,000 |
| FONDATION BON DEPART DE CANADIAN TIRE DU QUEBEC | C$700 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LGLA GRANDE TABLE7× · 2017–2024 · C$25k · revenue +224%
- PSPARTAGE ST FRANCOIS2× · 2023–2024 · C$19k · revenue +21%
- CDCENTRE D'ENTRAIDE PLUS DE L'ESTRIE7× · 2017–2024 · C$18k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- CDCENTRE D'ENTRAIDE PLUS DE L'ESTRIEone grant, 2021 · C$3k
- MEMOISSON ESTRIEone grant, 2023 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Service qui favorisent la sécurité alimentaire
Épicerie de quartier avec objectif de favoriser l'autonomie alimentaire chez les personnes/familles fragilisées économiquement rabais de 25% aux personnes les plus démunis offrir des aliments frais repas préparés et complets
Assurer une disribution hebdomadaire alimentaire ainsi qu'un service de dépannage alimentaire selon les besoins service d'accueil d'écoute et de référence vers les ressources appropriées
Dépannage alimentaire
Service de soutien à domicile accompagnement tramsport popote roulante aide à l'épicerie. 100 bénévoles plus de 6000 heures de bénévolat par année.
Supprot ou dépannage alimentaire aux personnes et familles démunies et à faible revenus
Service de dépannage service de maintien a domicile
Soulager la pauvreté et contribuer à la sécurité alimentaire de personnes démunies en opérant une épierie économique offrant des denrées à faible prix offrir aux personnes démunies un lieu communautaire aux fins de briser leur isolement…
Service d'entraide et de dépannage pour les personnes défavorisées et friperie.
Offrir à toutes les personnes qui font face aux défis alimentaires sur le territoire un service compte de dépannage alimentaire.
Supporter les démunis du quartier par l’aide alimentaire et professionnelle des personnes défavorisées qui ont des difficultés et de favoriser la réinsertion sociale et professionnelle des personnes défavorisées qui ont des difficultés…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Chaudronnee De L'estrie Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Sherbrooke Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation canadienne FCSCJ · Les Petites Soeurs de la Sainte-Famille · Soeurs Missionnaires de Notre-Dame Des Anges · Centraide Estrie (Conseil Régional de Bien-Être de Sherbrooke) · La Fondation Rock Guertin Inc. · Fondation Frontenac · Fondation Carmand Normand · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · Province de Saint-Joseph des servantes du Saint-Coeur de Marie · Fondation Des Oeuvres Charitables St-Roch Inc. · Congregation Missionnaire de Mariannhill
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.