Rouyn-Noranda, QC · Public foundation
Fondation Communautaire de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Promotion de la philanthropie en région aide et services destinés aux organismes de bienfiassance reconnus et autres fondations existantes.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$5k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$30k
- C$50k–250k2 grants · C$259k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AGORA DES ARTS | C$195,000 |
| ORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE RÉGIONAL ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE | C$63,644 |
| CENTRE DES ARTISTES EN ARTS VISUELS DE L'ABITIBI-TÉMISCAM... | C$30,000 |
| SOCIÉTÉ D'HISTOIRE ET DU PATIRMOINE DE LA RÉGION DE LA SARRE | C$5,000 |
| FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE ST PHILIPPE DE LA REINE | C$300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 71% of grant dollars (C$280k). The 29% that went abroad (C$114k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 29% of all-years giving (C$114k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$99k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ADAGORA DES ARTS3× · 2018–2024 · C$196k · revenue +414%
- ÉDÉCOLE DE MUSIQUE HARRICANA2× · 2020–2022 · C$4k · revenue +13%
- FDFABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE ST PHILIPPE DE LA REINE3× · 2020–2024 · C$2k · revenue -669%
Funded once
- CDCENTRE DES ARTISTES EN ARTS VISUELS DE L'ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGone grant, 2023 · C$20k
- MDMouvement de la relève d'Amos régionone grant, 2019 · C$15k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · C$15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Spectacles historiques et artistiques événements corporatifs édition de livres
Production de spectacles
Création production présentation de spectacles de théàtre et ateliers de recherche.
Arts et cultures
Diffusion de théâtre de marionnettes production de théâtre de marionnettes
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Société d'Histoire et du Patrimoine de la Région de la Sarre and the most unlike its peers is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Philippe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AGORA DES ARTS ↗
- Who funds FONDATION POUR LA NATURE ASSELIN-CHICOBI ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ D'HISTOIRE ET DU PATIRMOINE DE LA RÉGION DE LA SARRE ↗
- Who funds ÉCOLE DE MUSIQUE HARRICANA ↗
- Who funds CENTRE BERNARD-HAMEL ↗
- Who funds Muni-Spec ↗
- Who funds FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE ST PHILIPPE DE LA REINE ↗
- Who funds LA MAISON DE SOINS PALLIATIFS DE ROUYN-NORANDA ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE/ALZHEIMER SOCIETY AB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.