Alfred, ON · Public foundation
Fondation Colombienne St. Victor Inc.
Don recu et redistribue a des organismes dans le besoin
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION RESIDENCE PRESCOTT RUSSEL | C$4,500 |
| FONDATION HOPITAL GENERAL HAWKESBURY | C$4,500 |
| PAROISSE ST-VICTOR D'ALFRED | C$3,940 |
| SOCIETE CANADIENNE DU CANCER | C$100 |
| MISSION ETRANGERES | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PSPAROISSE ST-VICTOR D'ALFRED3× · 2019–2024 · C$8k · revenue +55%
- MEMISSION ETRANGERES4× · 2017–2024 · C$225 · revenue +11%
- SCSOCIETE CANADIENNE DU CANCER2× · 2023–2024 · C$200 · revenue +13%
Funded once
- RAREGROUPEMENT AUTHISME PRESCOTT RUSSELgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$100 · revenue +80%
- FKFONDATION KNIGHT OF COLOMBUS CHARITYone grant, 2019 · C$40 · revenue -66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.
Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…
Soins médicaux spécialisés en cardiologie
Dons à des donataires reconnus
Recherche et conférences. organisation de levées de fonds par le biais de conférences et d'évènements. publication d'article scientifique dans le but de communiquer des informations au public.
Soins généraux et spécialisée médicaux de courte durée et services de soins de longue durée
Accès à la défibrilation recherche cardiovasculaire
Éducation et sensibilisation de la santé oculaire. contribuer à l'avancement en offrant des bourses de l'équipements et autres services aux chercheurs et étudiants
Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Le secours aux lepreux (Canada) Inc.the Leprosy relief (Canada) Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Club Colombien St. Miguel D'alfred Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Club Colombien St-Miguel ↗
- Who funds PAROISSE ST-VICTOR D'ALFRED ↗
- Who funds FONDATION RESIDENCE PRESCOTT RUSSEL ↗
- Who funds FONDATION HOPITAL GENERAL HAWKESBURY ↗
- Who funds MISSION ETRANGERES ↗
- Who funds SOCIETE CANADIENNE DU CANCER ↗
- Who funds SECOURS AUX LÉPREUX ↗
- Who funds REGROUPEMENT AUTHISME PRESCOTT RUSSEL ↗
- Who funds FONDATION KNIGHT OF COLOMBUS CHARITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.