Skip to content
Canadian charities

Saint-Lambert, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Éclo

La fondation a effectué 7 dons à des donataires reconnus (identifiés sur le formulaire t1236).

C$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$32k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$15k
C$5,500
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$425k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION LISE WATIERC$15,000
FONDATION HÔPITAL CHARLES-LEMOYNEC$8,650
FILLACTIVEC$7,500
FONDATION EULALIE-DUROCHERC$5,500
FONDATION Y DES FEMMESC$5,000
FONDATION NOËL AU PRINTEMPSC$4,398
FONDATION SOPHIE BARATC$903
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$309k · 6 repeat orgsC$51k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

C$309k
C$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FE
    FONDATION EULALIE-DUROCHER
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$212k · revenue +79%
  • FN
    FONDATION NOEL AU PRINTEMPS
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$26k · revenue +235%
  • FH
    FONDATION HÔPITAL CHARLES-LEMOYNE
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$24k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • FS
    FONDATION SAINTE-ANNEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k · revenue +45%
  • FM
    FONDATION MARIE-VINCENT
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +12%
  • SA
    SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER
    one grant, 2021 · C$3k · revenue -52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fondation Santé
—
2
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
3
La Fondation Un élan pour la vie
—
4
Fondation Eduquer En Francais
—
5
Fondation Alain Lemaire
—
6
Fondation Le Bon Pilote
—
7
Fondation le Piolet
—
8
Fondation Celine Daniel Et Laurent
—
9
Fondation: Ecole Saint-Etienne
—
10
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
11
Fondation Maxime-Letendre
—
12
Fondation Philippe Laprise
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Sainte-Anne inc. and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION EULALIE-DUROCHER — C$212,496 over 3y, 25% of budgetFONDATION NOEL AU PRINTEMPS — C$25,898 over 4y, 11% of budgetFONDATION HÔPITAL CHARLES-LEMOYNE — C$24,032 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION Y DES FEMMES — C$20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION SAINTE-ANNE — C$15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION LISE WATIER — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHUM FONDATION — C$14,620 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION SOURCE BLEUE — C$11,720 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFILLACTIVE — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION MARIE-VINCENT — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADON CANADAHELPS — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEUCAN — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION SOPHIE BARAT — C$903 over 1y, 40% of budgetFONDATION DU GRAND DÉFI PIERRE LAVOIE — C$750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEUNES EN TÊTE — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CHRISTIAN VACHON — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget24H TREMBLANT — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Fondation Lise et Ric…Fondation Famille God…Conam Charitable Foun…Fondation Sandra et A…Fondation Famille Ben…Fondation Philantra P…CN Employees' and Pen…La Fondation du Grand…Centraide Du Grand Mo…Fondation Groupe AGF …La Fondation Familles…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC14.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Lise et Richard Fortin · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Fondation Sandra et Alain Bouchard · Fondation Famille Benoit · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation Groupe AGF / AGF Group Foundation · La Fondation Familles Samara

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 761119072:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Éclo’s filings →