Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Laval, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Celine Dion/Celine Dion Foundation

Financer des activités récréatives pour les enfants de moins de 18 ans atteints d'une maladie incurable afin de réaliser leurs rêves; appuyer les activités scolaires liées à l'éducation et à la connaissance scolaire; apporter une aide financière à une personne malade; effectuer des dons à d'autres organismes de bienfaisance ou à des…

C$288k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$288k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$288,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOC$288,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 81% of grant dollars (C$1.2M). The 19% that went abroad (C$291k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 19% of all-years giving (C$291k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$841k · 16 repeat orgsC$659k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
30

Total granted

C$841k
C$371k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+36%

Still filing today

94%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$288k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FONDAITON CHU STE-JUSTINE
    3× · 2017–2020 · C$552k · revenue +77%
  • FB
    FONDATION BON DÉPART DE CANADIAN-TIRE
    2× · 2017–2019 · C$50k · revenue +11%
  • CD
    CLUB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERS DU QUÉBEC
    4× · 2017–2021 · C$43k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • UD
    UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$140k · revenue +38%
  • FE
    FONDATION EVENKO
    one grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue -22%
  • SP
    St Paul's Hospital Foundation of Vancouvergraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue +156%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
La Fondation Santé
—
3
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
4
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
5
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
6
Fondation Jonquière-Médic
—
7
Fondation de l'hôpital Jean-Talon

Contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité des soins et des services offerts à la clientèle et à la promotion de la santé dans la communauté en soutenant financièrement le développement de l'hôpital jean-talon et du ciusss du…

—
8
Fondation santé bien-être de l'Est de Montréal

Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…

—
9
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
10
Fondation de L'Hopital Marie-Clarac

Améliorer la qualité des soins et des services offerts aux bénéficiaires de l'hôpital marie-clarac en effectuant des dons.

—
11
Fondation de l'hôpital Lasalle

Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.

—
12
Fondation Mon Étoile pour le financement de la recherche curative du cancer
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation du cancer du sein du Québec/Québec Breast Cancer Foundation and the most unlike its peers is La Maison Adhémar-Dion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/42
Grantees still filing
33/42
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDAITON CHU STE-JUSTINE — C$552,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL — C$140,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIBROSE KISTIQUE CANADA — C$92,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION EVENKO — C$50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSt Paul's Hospital Foundation of Vancouver — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION BON DÉPART DE CANADIAN-TIRE — C$50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCLUB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERS DU QUÉBEC — C$42,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFondation IUCPQ — C$40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCROIX-ROGUE CNADIENNE — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlergies Québec — C$20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFondation pour l'encouragement Scolaire — C$15,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetFONDATION INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTRÉAL — C$13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CHARLES-BRUNEAU — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIRIAM FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION CANADIENNE RÊVES D'ENFANTS — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUVEMENT SANTÉ MENTALE DU QUÉBEC — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetFONDATION DU CHUM — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION CANADIENNE RÊVES D'ENFANTS — C$5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION JEAN LAPOINTE — C$5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE REGAIN DE VIE — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJAMAICA COLLEGE OLD BOYS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetOLYMPIQUES SPÉCIAUX QUÉBEC — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMaison de Répit Claire de Lune — C$3,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFondation Dr Clown — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HOPITAL DU SACRÉ-COEUR DE MONTRÉAL — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA MAISON ADHÉMAR DION — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFondation Benny&Co — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFondation de l'École Nationale du Cirque — C$2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION MAMAN DION — C$2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION SUR LA POINTE DES PIEDS — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION ROBERT PICHÉ INC — C$1,657 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFONDATION SANTÉ SUD DE LANAUDIÈRE — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE LA SSS DE L'ÉNERGIE — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DU CANCER DU SEIN — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANOREXIE ET BOULIMIE QUÉBEC — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION JEAN MARC PAQUETTE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLa maison Kangourou — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFondation RSTR — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION HOSPOTALIÈRE D'AMOS — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFondation Marie-Vincent — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MIRA INC. — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOratoire St-Joseph du Mont-Royal — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand Mo…Fondation St-HubertJewish Community Foun…Fondation Famille God…Conam Charitable Foun…Fondation Luc MauriceFondation Philantra P…Fondation Sandra et A…Centraide Québec Cha…Mobile Giving Foundat…Fondation Fasken Mart…Fondation Jacques & M…
Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC14.9× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation St-Hubert · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Fondation Luc Maurice · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Fondation Sandra et Alain Bouchard · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Mobile Giving Foundation Canada / Fondation des dons mobiles du Canada · Fondation Fasken Martineau Dumoulin /Fasken Martineau Dumoulin Foundation · Fondation Jacques & Michel Auger

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 891515421:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Celine Dion/Celine Dion’s filings →