Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Verdun, QC · Public foundation

Fondation Casse-Tête

Effectuer des dons à des donataires reconnues dans le but améliorer la qualité de vie de personnes atteintes de problèmes de santé mentale.

C$19k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
—
Regions reached
C$19k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$18,706
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION RELIEFC$18,706
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$175k · 6 repeat orgsC$221k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

C$175k
C$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+300%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • R
    REVIVRE
    3× · 2017–2023 · C$84k · revenue +212%
  • FC
    FONDATION CERVO
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$25k · revenue +3%
  • LB
    LA BOUSSOLE
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$10k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • MR
    MAISON REVIVREgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$150k · revenue +300% · 50% of their budget
  • MR
    MAISON REVIVRE
    one grant, 2022 · C$40k
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'INSTITUT DOUGLAS
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation des maladies mentales / Mental Illness Foundation
—
2
Organisation Sante Mentale Oeuvrant Sensibilisation Entraide

Favoriser la sensibilisation et fournir de l'aide en santé mentale

—
3
Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel
—
4
Survivre

Recherche sur les indices de souffrance numérique publication de texte de sensibilisation sur les problèmes de santé mentale

—
5
Le phare source d'entraide

Donner à des personnes ayant des problèmes de santé mentale l'opportunité de développer leurs capacités et leurs ressources afin de favoriser leurs valorisation leu antonomie. leur réappropriation du pouvoir sur elles-mêmes leur situation…

—
6
Mouvance

Sensibilisation à la prévention du suicide promotion de la santé mentale

—
7
Fondation Travail et Santé Mentale
—
8
Le Portail

Regrouper les membres de l'entourage d'une personne qui présente des difficultés ou des manifestations relées à la maladie mentale leur offrir du soutien et de l'information afin de leur permettre d'actualiser leur potentiel.

—
9
Fondation Casse-Tête

Effectuer des dons à des donataires reconnues dans le but améliorer la qualité de vie de personnes atteintes de problèmes de santé mentale.

—
10
Association De Parents Et Amis De Personnes Atteintes De Mal

Venir en aide aux personnes prises avec la santé mentale

—
11
Le Maillon 'Regroupement De Parents Et Amis De La Personne Atteinte De Maladie Mentale Du Saguenay'

Offrir de l'aide et du support aux parents et amis atteint d'une maladie mentale

—
12
Fondation ma vie en main

Soutien à la formation de personnes atteintes de la maladie mentale.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Entraide Saint-Michel and the most unlike its peers is Maison Revivre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAISON REVIVRE — C$150,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetREVIVRE — C$83,706 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetFONDATION INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE SANTÉ MENTALE DE MTL — C$40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFONDATION CERVO — C$25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLA BOUSSOLE — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFONDATION DE L'INSTITUT DOUGLAS — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION LES PETITS TRÉSORS — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMON SHACK, MES CHOIX, MON AVENIR — C$5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetANOREXIE ET BOULIMIE QUÉBEC — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetACCÈS PSY — C$2,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetENTRAIDE ST-MICHEL — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand Mo…Centraide Québec Cha…Fondation Québec Phil…La Fondation du Grand…Conam Charitable Foun…TELUS Friendly Future…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…United Way East Ontar…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC8.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Conam Charitable Foundation · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 841374531:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Casse-Tête’s filings →